Form · Construction & Infrastructure
Scott schedule for an ACAT building dispute: completion guide
Link to the scott schedule the ACAT civil disputes page says parties may have to lodge when defects are claimed in a building dispute. The link text states no form number. The Word file was not opened. The originating civil application is a different guide.
- Kind
- Form. A form to complete, or a guide to completing an official one.
- Where it applies
- Australian Capital Territory
- AI use
- Yellow You and the tool draft together, with you directing. You check every statement you rely on.
- Law stated as at
- 22 October 2026
- Status
- Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the official form at acat.act.gov.au and the 2 authorities it cites, for Australian Capital Territory.
- Version
- 1
- Source
- Link to the official form. Licence: © ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Link only: download the current scott schedule from the civil disputes page each time; do not copy or adapt it.
Where this comes from
The official form is published by acat.act.gov.au; this page is a completion guide. Last checked on 2026-10-22.
When to use it
Use when an ACAT civil dispute is a building dispute in which defects are claimed, and the civil disputes page requires a scott schedule. Do not use this schedule as the originating application. The tool does not write the defect items.
Used for these tasks
- Build a defects schedule and draft the demand from the inspection reports
- Index expert reports in a building dispute
- Build the statutory warranty and liability cut-off schedule for a residential building claim
Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.
How AI may be used
AI may check the pack against the current form and list missing documents. The lawyer writes the complaint items, the defect descriptions and any conduct allegations, and checks every filing.
AI may
- Check the pack against the current official form and list missing documents named on the page
- Flag when a defects schedule, a review form or a disciplinary application is being used for the wrong dispute
- List the time limits and lodgement path stated on the page that was opened
AI must not
- Must not draft complaint items, defect descriptions, contract allegations or conduct allegations
- Must not draft pleadings, a scott schedule's item text, or a statement of claim
- Must not sign, file or serve the application
The lawyer checks
- The originating application is the current civil dispute application, which has its own guide
- The scott schedule is added when the page's building-defect requirement applies
- The page's $25,000 example, and agreement to hear a higher claim, are checked against the current jurisdictional rule
- The court's or tribunal's current index is checked before assuming a generative-AI practice direction applies. None was stated on the page opened for this guide.
Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.
Official form
Open the official form. Always use the current version from the issuer. Licence: © ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Link only: download the current scott schedule from the civil disputes page each time; do not copy or adapt it..
Read the full text
The full text is available after you log in. It is free. When you log in you can:
- read the whole precedent, with its drafting notes beside it;
- copy it, or download it as a Word file or Markdown;
- add it to your firm’s knowledge base, so colleagues can find it;
- let the AI tools you connect read it from that knowledge base.
The summary, the law it rests on and the AI-use guidance above stay public. Privacy.
More in Construction & Infrastructure
- Application for a commercial building dispute (QCAT Form 25)
- Building and construction dispute (State Administrative Tribunal): completion guide
- Residential building defects notice and claim letter (statutory warranties, NSW)
- Security of payment: payment claim (NSW base, with Victorian, Queensland, NZ and UK variants)
- Victorian payment claim checks
- Application for a domestic building dispute (QCAT Form 26)
- Residential building dispute application (TASCAT): completion guide
- Notice of dispute under a construction contract (AS 4000 family and bespoke contracts)
- Security of payment: payment schedule with reasons for withholding (NSW, with Queensland and Victorian notes)
- Victorian payment schedule checks
- Deed of novation of a design consultant to a design and construct contractor
- Application for a debt recovery proceeding (QCAT Form 27)
- Residential building review (TASCAT section 58 form): completion guide
- Queensland adjudication application (QBCC approved form): preparation guide
- Victorian domestic building warranties schedule
- Response and counter-application (QCAT Form 36)
- Notice of delay and claim for extension of time under a construction contract
- Covering letter to a principal contractor serving a payment withholding request (NSW)
- Queensland project trust and retention trust register
- Contract clause: AI-generated design, BIM data and practitioner responsibility
- Request for a decision by default, unliquidated damages (QCAT Form 50)
- Disciplinary application, building work contractors (SACAT): completion guide
- Queensland direction to rectify record
- Alleged defective or incomplete work schedule (QCAT)
- Protocol for AI use in expert delay and quantum analysis (construction disputes)
- Sample terms of settlement (VCAT building and property list)
All precedents for Construction & Infrastructure · Tasks and AI use in this area