Checklist · Energy, Resources & Mining

EPBC significant-impact self-assessment before a referral

The four questions in the 2013 Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1 for deciding whether an action should be referred under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Kind
Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
Where it applies
Australia
AI use
Yellow You and the tool draft together, with you directing. You check every statement you rely on.
Law stated as at
22 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the 2 authorities it cites, for Australia.
Version
1
Source
Written for this library

When to use it

Use when a project may affect a matter of national environmental significance and someone must decide whether to refer it. The species-by-species criteria in the guideline are applied from the guideline, not copied here.

Used for these tasks

Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.

How AI may be used

AI may list the matters named in a search report against the nine matters in the guideline and park the four questions; the lawyer decides whether a significant impact is likely and whether to refer.

AI may

  • Enter survey results already on the file against each matter of national environmental significance
  • Break the project into construction, operation and closure so the broadest scope is visible
  • List proposed avoidance measures and mark whether their effectiveness is demonstrated

AI must not

  • Must not decide that an impact is not significant
  • Must not treat a mitigation measure as removing the need to refer unless its effectiveness is established
  • Must not lodge a referral

The lawyer checks

  • The action is described at its broadest scope, including related activities and indirect impacts
  • Each matter that may be present is tested against the significant-impact criteria in the guideline for that matter
  • Uncertainty about a serious or irreversible impact is not treated as a reason not to refer
  • Any prior-authorisation or continuing-use exemption is taken from the current Act, not assumed

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Read the full text

More in Energy, Resources & Mining

All precedents for Energy, Resources & Mining · Tasks and AI use in this area