Checklist · Energy, Resources & Mining
Native title right-to-negotiate (s 31) agreement checklist
Step-by-step checklist for the Native Title Act right-to-negotiate process for a mining tenement: notification, timetable, good-faith negotiation, deed terms, arbitral determinations, and safeguards for cultural information.
- Kind
- Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
- Where it applies
- Australia, Commonwealth
- AI use
- Yellow AI can help in set ways. A lawyer checks specific points before use.
- Law stated as at
- 17 October 2026
- Status
- Maintained. Checked against the cited sources on 17 October 2026.
- Version
- 1
- Source
- Written for this library
When to use it
Use when a tenement grant attracts the right to negotiate under Subdivision P of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Do not use where the expedited procedure applies without objection, or where an indigenous land use agreement already covers the act; use the ILUA section instead.
How AI may be used
AI may keep the statutory timetable and summarise public register entries. Cultural, genealogical and site information must stay out of AI tools unless the native title party has given informed consent and its data protocols are met.
AI may
- Calculate candidate dates from the notification day (3-month, 6-month) for the lawyer to confirm and diarise.
- Summarise public National Native Title Tribunal register extracts into a party and claim table with source references.
- Draft meeting agendas and a negotiation log template from the lawyer's notes.
- Compare a draft deed against this checklist and list missing items.
AI must not
- Must not receive sacred site locations, cultural knowledge, genealogies or confidential meeting records without the native title party's informed consent.
- Must not characterise whether negotiations were in good faith or whether an act attracts the expedited procedure.
- Must not draft benefit amounts or recommend a negotiating position.
The lawyer checks
- The act is one to which Subdivision P applies and no ILUA or approved alternative state regime displaces it.
- Every native title party has been identified from current registers, and the notification day is taken from the notice itself.
- The authorisation and consultation steps required by the RNTBC's rules and the PBC regulations have been followed.
- Any AI use complies with the native title party's data protocols and the firm's confidentiality obligations.
Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.
Official form
Open the official form. Always use the current version from the issuer.
Read the full text
The full text is for signed-in accounts. It is free. When you sign in you can:
- read the whole precedent, with its drafting notes beside it;
- copy it, or download it as a Word file or Markdown;
- add it to your firm’s knowledge base, so colleagues can find it;
- let the AI tools you connect read it from that knowledge base.
The summary, the law it rests on and the AI-use guidance above stay public. Privacy.
More in Energy, Resources & Mining
- Land access arrangement with landholder for exploration (NSW, with Queensland notes)
- Farm-in and unincorporated joint venture heads of terms (mining tenement)
- Corporate renewable power purchase agreement (PPA) term sheet
- AI-assisted tenement, title and approvals due diligence protocol
- Clause: autonomous and AI-enabled equipment in mining services contracts
All precedents for Energy, Resources & Mining · Tasks and AI use in this area