New York Supreme Court part rules: AI certifications for Justices Bannon (New York County, Part 61), Clavin and Kenny (Nassau, Parts 50 and 28), Lancman (Queens, Part 20) and Weinmann (Erie, Part 8)
Fill-in AI wording keyed to five New York Supreme Court justices' part rules: Bannon (certification on every motion, hearing or trial submission), Clavin and Lancman (disclose the tool and certify in the document), Kenny (no-AI certification or affirmation) and Weinmann.
MaintainedWe keep this page up to date.Law stated as at
Kind
Court document A document filed or served in a court or tribunal.
Version
1
Where it applies
United States, New York
AI use
Green The tool writes the first draft inside a template you have already tested. You check it. Without that test, first drafting starts at Yellow.
Source
Written for this library
Status
Maintained. Checked on 8 November 2026 against the 6 authorities it cites, for United States and New York.
When to use it
Use in civil cases before one of these five justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Bannon and Kenny require a statement even where no AI was used. Statewide, 22 NYCRR Part 161 does not require disclosure but lets a court adopt its own part rule, so check the assigned justice's current rules.
How to use this precedent
Check that it fits the matter: read “When to use it” and the places it applies to.
Log in to read the full text. It is free.
Adapt it to the matter, filling in each placeholder shown in [square brackets].
Use AI only as far as the Green level allows. “How AI may be used” says what AI may and must not do.
Before it goes out, a lawyer checks it against current law and each point under “The lawyer checks”.
How AI may be used
A tool may lay out the statement the rule or order provides and fill in facts the signer gives it. The signer decides what to say about the AI use and makes the checks the statement describes.
AI may
Insert the tool name, version and uses the signer has recorded
Insert only a version of the statement that the rule or order provides and that matches the signer's account of AI use
Check that the statement sits where the rule or order says it must
AI must not
Must not state that citations, quotations or facts were checked; only the signer can say that after doing it
Must not describe the AI use more narrowly than the file record shows
Must not put prompts, privileged material or confidential client information in the statement
The lawyer checks
The current rule or order has been opened on the court's own site and matches the words used
Every citation and quotation was checked by a person against an official or recognised source
The statement is placed and signed as the rule requires, by the person the rule names
For Bannon and Kenny, the no-AI version is used only where it is true for every document in the submission