Checklist · Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Victorian Supreme Court and County Court AI verification

Own-words and verification steps in Supreme Court SC GEN 25 and County Court PNCCV 1-2026. Neither note prescribes a disclosure sentence. Each requires the Court user to be able to identify portions produced with AI and explain the check.

Kind
Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
Where it applies
Australia, Victoria
AI use
Red You write the text. The tool writes nothing into the document. Where permitted, it may check, clarify or collect data, and anything it checks or collects is verified.
Law stated as at
22 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the 2 authorities it cites, for Australia and Victoria.
Version
1
Source
Written for this library

When to use it

Use when a court document, including an affidavit, witness statement or expert report, is prepared for the Supreme Court of Victoria or the County Court of Victoria. Keep the paragraph numbers of each court separate. SC GEN 25 commences on 14 May 2026. PNCCV 1-2026 is version 1.0 of 5 June 2026.

Used for these tasks

Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.

How AI may be used

Both notes require an affidavit or witness statement to be sworn or finalised in the person's own knowledge and words. The lawyer writes that document. AI may keep the verification record the notes say the Court user must be prepared to explain.

AI may

  • Record which portion was produced using AI, which tool, and how a person checked it
  • List the verification items in SC GEN 25 paragraph 7.4 or PNCCV 1-2026 paragraph 6.4
  • Mark a public-tool input that includes confidential or suppressed information for the lawyer

AI must not

  • Must not generate the affidavit, witness statement or expert opinion
  • Must not treat one AI tool as confirmation of another AI tool's content
  • Must not use the Supreme Court paragraph numbers for a County Court document, or the reverse
  • Must not add a disclosure certificate either note does not require, unless the Court directs further information

The lawyer checks

  • The sworn or affirmed document reflects the person's own knowledge and words
  • References to cases, legislation, textbooks and articles were checked against a source known to be accurate
  • The expert report follows the code or practice note named in the relevant footnote. Those instruments were not opened
  • A direction under SC GEN 25 paragraph 7.5 or PNCCV 1-2026 paragraph 6.5 can be answered from the record

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Read the full text

More in Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution

All precedents for Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution · Tasks and AI use in this area