Checklist · Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Queensland responsible person on written submissions
The named responsible person, and the accuracy check, in Supreme Court Practice Direction 5 of 2025 and District Court Practice Direction 12 of 2025. Naming the person is how the Court is told the check was done.
- Kind
- Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
- Where it applies
- Australia, Queensland
- AI use
- Red You write the text. The tool writes nothing into the document. Where permitted, it may check, clarify or collect data, and anything it checks or collects is verified.
- Law stated as at
- 22 October 2026
- Status
- Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the 3 authorities it cites, for Australia and Queensland.
- Version
- 1
- Source
- Written for this library
When to use it
Use when written submissions are filed in the Supreme Court of Queensland or the District Court of Queensland, or when oral submissions are made on those written submissions. Expert-report annexures under Supreme Court Practice Direction 14 of 2024 are a different instrument.
Used for these tasks
Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.
How AI may be used
The responsible person is named on the document that is filed, and that naming tells the Court the accuracy obligation was performed. The lawyer does the check and the naming. AI may list the sources for the lawyer to open.
AI may
- Place a blank at the end of the submissions for the responsible person's name
- List each citation so the lawyer can open the source
- Note whether the hearing will include oral submissions, so the District Court paragraph 7 question is asked
AI must not
- Must not name a firm instead of the individual practitioner
- Must not generate the submissions
- Must not mark a citation as accurate without the lawyer opening it
- Must not treat the Supreme Court and District Court directions as identical on paragraph 7. The Supreme Court scrape jumps from paragraph 6 to paragraph 8
The lawyer checks
- The named person has verified the accuracy and relevance of references to legislation, authorities and other sources
- The expression reflects that person's professional judgment
- For the District Court, the person who speaks to the written submissions is identified, because paragraph 7 makes that person a responsible person for the written submissions as well
- The signed Supreme Court PDF is checked for a paragraph 7 before the District Court paragraph is copied across
Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.
Read the full text
The full text is available after you log in. It is free. When you log in you can:
- read the whole precedent, with its drafting notes beside it;
- copy it, or download it as a Word file or Markdown;
- add it to your firm’s knowledge base, so colleagues can find it;
- let the AI tools you connect read it from that knowledge base.
The summary, the law it rests on and the AI-use guidance above stay public. Privacy.
More in Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution
- Federal Court Form 122: notice of appeal
- Originating application (Federal Court Form 15): completion guide and accompanying-document rule
- Overarching obligations certification (Magistrates' Court of Victoria Form 4A)
- Notice of originating motion (Supreme Court of Western Australia Form 64): completion guide
- Writ of summons (Supreme Court of Western Australia Form 1): completion guide
- Letter of demand with genuine-steps and limitation notes
- NSW SC Gen 23 affidavit and expert AI statements
- AO 133 bill of costs
- AO 440 summons in a civil action (US district court): issue, serve and prove service
- Litigation hold notice (federal civil)
- Federal Court GPN-AI evidence disclosure
- Federal Court Form 121: notice of appeal from the Federal Circuit and Family Court
- Defence (Federal Court Form 33): pleading rules, 28-day time limit and completion guide
- Proper basis certification (Magistrates' Court of Victoria Form 4B)
- Writ of summons (District Court of Western Australia template): completion guide
- Originating summons (Supreme Court of Western Australia Forms 74 and 75): completion guide
- Statement of claim: NSW UCPR Form 3A and Federal Court Form 17 (completion guide)
- AO 136 certificate of good standing
- AO 398 notice of a lawsuit and request to waive service of a summons
- Rule 26(f) discovery-plan report
- Federal Court Form 117: application for leave to appeal
- Affidavit (Federal Court Form 59): form rules, annexures and GPN-AI limits on AI in evidence
- Claim and statement of claim (South Australia Uniform Civil Rules Form 1 and Form 1S): completion guide
- Notice of defence (Magistrates' Court of Victoria Form 8A)
- Application for judicial review (Supreme Court of Western Australia Form 67): completion guide
- Interlocutory application pack: orders sought, short minutes and outline of submissions (NSW notice of motion and Federal Court Form 35)
- AO 399 waiver of the service of summons
- Discovery meet-and-confer letter
- Victorian Supreme Court and County Court AI verification
- Deed of settlement and release (commercial dispute, with consent orders)
- Federal Court Form 16: applicant's genuine steps statement
- Subpoenas (Federal Court Forms 43A, 43B and 43C): issuing, service, conduct money and production
- Originating application (Queensland UCPR Form 5)
- Originating application (South Australia Uniform Civil Rules Form 2): completion guide
- Writ (Supreme Court of Tasmania Form 2): completion guide
- AO 85 notice, consent and reference of a civil action to a magistrate judge
- Stipulated protective order (federal civil)
- Originating claim (ACT Court Procedures Rules Form 2.1): completion guide
- Federal Court Form 11: respondent's genuine steps statement
- Application in an existing proceeding (Queensland UCPR Form 9)
- Originating application to be served (Supreme Court of Tasmania Form 3): completion guide
- Gen AI verification checklist and disclosure wording for court documents (Federal Court, NSW, Victoria, Queensland)
- ESI discovery protocol
- WA Supreme Court generative AI evidence caution
- Client notice and consent: e-discovery, technology-assisted review and AI document review
- Originating application (ACT Court Procedures Rules Form 2.7): completion guide
- Federal Court Form 31: notice of cross-claim
- Writ (Supreme Court of the Northern Territory Form 5A): completion guide
- Request for consent order of registrar (Queensland UCPR Form 59A)
- SA courts Gen AI affidavit and disclosure position
- Pre-suit commercial demand letter
- Federal Court Form 38: list of documents
- Originating motion (Supreme Court of the Northern Territory Forms 5B, 5C, 5D and 5E): completion guide
- Tasmania Supreme Court Gen AI verify and explain
- Generative-AI filing certification worksheet
- ACT and NT indexes before assuming an AI direction
- Federal Court Form 48: notice of discontinuance
- Deposition outline (not testimony)
All precedents for Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution · Tasks and AI use in this area