Checklist · Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution

WA Supreme Court generative AI evidence caution

The Western Australian Supreme Court guidelines on verifying AI content, keeping affidavits in the witness's own words, and disclosing use when the Court directs or where it is necessary or appropriate. No certificate is prescribed.

Kind
Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
Where it applies
Australia, Western Australia
AI use
Red You write the text. The tool writes nothing into the document. Where permitted, it may check, clarify or collect data, and anything it checks or collects is verified.
Law stated as at
22 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the authority it cites, for Australia and Western Australia.
Version
1
Source
Written for this library

When to use it

Use for a proceeding in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, including a civil or criminal proceeding, and including an expert witness. The guidelines PDF that was opened does not state an issue date or a commencement date. A separate consultation note is not an in-force direction.

Used for these tasks

Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.

How AI may be used

Paragraph 11 concerns affidavits, witness statements and expert opinions. Those documents are evidence. The lawyer writes them. AI may keep a note of any use so a later direction to disclose can be answered.

AI may

  • Record whether generative AI was used, in which part, and how a person checked it
  • Flag confidential, suppressed or privileged material before it is placed in a public or unsecured tool

AI must not

  • Must not substitute AI text for the witness's own words or the expert's own opinion
  • Must not treat assistance from a generative AI tool as an answer to an error or omission
  • Must not treat the consultation note as a practice direction
  • Must not invent a non-use certificate. The guidelines do not prescribe one

The lawyer checks

  • A person who signs, certifies, files or relies on the document has verified it
  • The affidavit or witness statement is in the witness's own words and reflects personal knowledge
  • The expert report follows Practice Direction 4.5.2.1. That practice direction was not opened
  • Disclosure is made when the Court directs it, or where it is otherwise necessary or appropriate

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Read the full text

More in Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution

All precedents for Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution · Tasks and AI use in this area