Checklist · Administrative & Public Law
Time table for an order of review
A table of the prescribed period in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) section 11, showing the arithmetic and leaving the result to the principal.
- Kind
- Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
- Where it applies
- Commonwealth
- AI use
- Red You write the text. The tool writes nothing into the document. Where permitted, it may check, clarify or collect data, and anything it checks or collects is verified.
- Law stated as at
- 22 October 2026
- Status
- Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the authority it cites, for Commonwealth.
- Version
- 1
- Source
- Written for this library
When to use it
Use when building a review-rights and time-limit table from a decision letter for an application under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth). It does not say the application is in time.
Used for these tasks
Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.
How AI may be used
AI may set out the section 11 arithmetic from dates on the decision letter, and must not say the application is in time or that time has expired.
AI may
- Enter the date the decision was made and the date a document setting out the terms was furnished, both taken from the letter
- Show the twenty-eighth day after the trigger day the principal marks, as arithmetic only
AI must not
- Must not decide which paragraph of subsection 11(3) applies
- Must not say the court should allow further time, or that a reasonable time has passed
- Must not invent a court form or a service method
- Must not paraphrase sections 13, 13A or 14 beyond the trigger words in section 11
The lawyer checks
- The principal decides whether paragraph 11(1)(c) applies to this decision
- The trigger day under subsection 11(3) is chosen by the principal
- Any request for further time is framed by the principal
- The Federal Court Rules and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) Rules are opened before a form is used
Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.
Read the full text
The full text is available after you log in. It is free. When you log in you can:
- read the whole precedent, with its drafting notes beside it;
- copy it, or download it as a Word file or Markdown;
- add it to your firm’s knowledge base, so colleagues can find it;
- let the AI tools you connect read it from that knowledge base.
The summary, the law it rests on and the AI-use guidance above stay public. Privacy.
More in Administrative & Public Law
- ART disclosure where Generative AI touches evidence
- Freedom of information access application (Commonwealth, with NSW and NZ variants and review follow-ups)
- Request consultation notice for a practical refusal reason
- Application for review of a decision (ACAT): completion guide
- Authority for a representative (Administrative Review Tribunal)
- Application for extension of time to apply for review (Administrative Review Tribunal): preparation guide
- Application for leave to appeal or appeal (QCAT Form 39)
- Letter before judicial review proceedings to a Commonwealth decision-maker (ADJR Act), with time-limit and genuine steps record
- ART checks before a Generative AI submission is lodged
- Public interest factors for a conditionally exempt document
- FOI third-party consultation notice: business information or personal information (FOI Act ss 27 and 27A)
- Request for a stay order (Administrative Review Tribunal): when a stay is available and how to ask for one
- Withdrawal of an application (Administrative Review Tribunal)
- Application to stay a decision (QCAT Form 44)
- General review form (TASCAT Administrative Stream): completion guide
- Request for a statement of reasons for an administrative decision, with reasons-deficiency table
- Judicial review grounds from the record
- Agency submission in response to a Commonwealth Ombudsman draft report or proposed critical opinions (Ombudsman Act s 8(5))
- ART protected information and Generative AI tools
- Request for reasons and review of an automated or AI-assisted government decision
- Application to be made a party (Administrative Review Tribunal)
- Request to issue a summons (Administrative Review Tribunal): give evidence, produce documents, or both
- Initiating application for a review (NTCAT Form 1): completion guide
- Application for miscellaneous matters (QCAT Form 40)
- Application to the Administrative Review Tribunal for review: completion guide (including the Generative AI Practice Direction)
- ART checklist before Generative AI material is lodged
- Notice opposing an extension of time (Administrative Review Tribunal)
- Request for reasons for a QCAT decision
- Review or original application (State Administrative Tribunal): completion guide
- ART certification if the Tribunal requires it
- Request to shorten time for lodging documents (Administrative Review Tribunal)
- Registration and sunsetting check for a legislative instrument
- Complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman: preparation guide and complaint summary
- Agency AI transparency statement under the DTA standard: advice note and template for government clients
- Hearing certificate (Administrative Review Tribunal)
- Guidance and Appeals Panel referral request, first instance
- Request for access under the FOI Act (Administrative Review Tribunal)
All precedents for Administrative & Public Law · Tasks and AI use in this area