Form · Administrative & Public Law

Application to the Administrative Review Tribunal for review: completion guide (including the Generative AI Practice Direction)

How to choose and complete the right ART application form: reviewable decision, time limits, fees, what goes in each part, attachments, and what the Tribunal's 2026 Generative AI Practice Direction requires of documents you lodge.

Kind
Form. A form to complete, or a guide to completing an official one.
Where it applies
Australia, Commonwealth
AI use
Yellow AI can help in set ways. A lawyer checks specific points before use.
Law stated as at
17 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 17 October 2026 against the official form at art.gov.au and the 5 authorities it cites, for Australia and Commonwealth.
Version
1
Source
Link to the official form. Licence: © Administrative Review Tribunal. Official forms are linked, not reproduced.

Where this comes from

The official form is published by art.gov.au; this page is a completion guide. Last checked on 2026-10-17.

When to use it

Use when a client wants merits review of a Commonwealth decision that an Act makes reviewable by the Administrative Review Tribunal. Always use the current official form or lodgement method. Do not use for decisions reviewable only by a court, or before any required internal review.

How AI may be used

AI may help prepare the chronology and a first draft of the reasons for seeking review from the decision and the client's instructions. The lawyer confirms jurisdiction, time and form, verifies every fact and citation, and makes any disclosure the Practice Direction requires.

AI may

  • Draft the chronology and a short statement of why the decision is wrong from the decision, reasons and the client's documents, with references.
  • Check a draft against the Practice Direction's verification list (facts provable, authorities exist, evidence references accurate).
  • Produce a plain-language explanation of the process for the client.

AI must not

  • Must not draft or alter the words of a statutory declaration or witness statement; the evidence must be the person's own.
  • Must not enter documents the decision-maker lodges with the Tribunal, or confidential or privileged material, into a public AI tool.
  • Must not decide reviewability, the correct form or the time limit.

The lawyer checks

  • The decision is reviewable by the Tribunal and any internal review step has been completed.
  • The time limit under the enabling Act or ART Rules s 5, and whether an extension application (s 19) is needed.
  • Every citation and fact in any submission is verified, and any required Generative AI disclosure appears at or near the start of the document.
  • The fee or concession evidence is attached and the current fee checked on the Tribunal website.

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Official form

Open the official form. Always use the current version from the issuer. Licence: © Administrative Review Tribunal. Official forms are linked, not reproduced..

Read the full text

More in Administrative & Public Law

All precedents for Administrative & Public Law · Tasks and AI use in this area