Checklist · Intellectual Property — Patents, Trade Marks, Copyright, Designs

Prior-art table for a standard patent

Table of prior art against the standard-patent requirements in section 18(1). It does not say the invention is patentable, and it is not a filing at the office.

Kind
Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
Where it applies
Commonwealth
AI use
Yellow You and the tool draft together, with you directing. You check every statement you rely on.
Law stated as at
22 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the authority it cites, for Commonwealth.
Version
1
Source
Written for this library

When to use it

Use when sorting search results or an inventor's disclosure into a prior-art table before examination, a response, or a freedom-to-operate review.

Used for these tasks

Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.

How AI may be used

The tool enters citations, dates and the claim numbers the lawyer nominates, and the lawyer decides novelty, inventive step and the other section 18(1) matters.

AI may

  • List citations with dates from the search report or disclosure the lawyer supplies.
  • Repeat a claim in the lawyer's words only where the lawyer has already written that claim.

AI must not

  • Do not state that the invention is a patentable invention, is novel, or involves an inventive step.
  • Do not draft a specification, claim or response to an examination report.
  • Do not treat section 18(1A) as the test unless the lawyer is dealing with an innovation patent.

The lawyer checks

  • Section 18(1) is subject to subsection (2). Human beings, and the biological processes for their generation, are not patentable inventions.
  • The note to section 18 points to sections 7 and 9. Those sections were not set out in this table.
  • Decide separately what, if anything, must be given to IP Australia. This table does not record a disclosure duty.

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Read the full text

More in Intellectual Property — Patents, Trade Marks, Copyright, Designs

All precedents for Intellectual Property — Patents, Trade Marks, Copyright, Designs · Tasks and AI use in this area