US state riders to the firm generative | AI Law Framework
Clause · AI decision systems
US state riders to the firm generative AI policy (California, Florida, Texas, D.C., New Jersey, Illinois)
Riders that add state-specific duties to the US firm generative AI policy: California statute and guidance, Florida Opinion 24-1 and rule comments, Texas Opinion 705, D.C. Opinion 388, New Jersey guidelines and the Illinois Supreme Court policy.
MaintainedWe keep this page up to date.Law stated as at
Kind
Clause Wording to drop into a longer document.
Version
1
Where it applies
United States, California, Florida, Texas, District of Columbia, New Jersey, Illinois
AI use
Yellow You and the tool draft together, with you directing. You check every statement you rely on.
Source
Written for this library
Status
Maintained. Checked on 7 November 2026 against the 8 authorities it cites, for 7 jurisdictions.
When to use it
Use with the US firm generative AI policy (a45-us-law-firm-generative-ai-use-policy) for each state where the firm's lawyers are admitted or appear. Add only the riders that apply. Each rider sits after the policy's main clauses.
How to use this precedent
Check that it fits the matter: read “When to use it” and the places it applies to.
Log in to read the full text. It is free.
Adapt it to the matter, filling in each placeholder shown in [square brackets].
Use AI only as far as the Yellow level allows. “How AI may be used” says what AI may and must not do.
Before it goes out, a lawyer checks it against current law and each point under “The lawyer checks”.
How AI may be used
A tool may select the riders for the states the firm lists and slot them into the policy. The managing lawyer confirms each state's current rules.
AI may
Pick the riders for the states the firm lists
Insert them after the policy's main clauses with the correct numbering
AI must not
Must not add a state rider for a state the firm has not listed
Must not paraphrase a rider to say more or less than the source
The lawyer checks
Each state's adopted rules and any newer ethics opinion
Court-specific AI orders in each state are handled in the litigation procedures, not here
The New York and Pennsylvania positions are added only from primary sources