Checklist · Client-facing & access-to-justice AI tools
Public legal information accuracy review record
Record for a lawyer checking a public page, fact sheet or guided interview before it is published or republished: what it says, the source checked, the advice line, and the date it must be looked at again.
- Kind
- Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
- Where it applies
- Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia
- AI use
- Yellow You and the tool draft together, with you directing. You check every statement you rely on.
- Law stated as at
- 22 October 2026
- Status
- Maintained. Checked on 22 October 2026 against the 4 authorities it cites, for 5 jurisdictions.
- Version
- 1
- Source
- Written for this library
When to use it
Use before publishing or updating website guides, fact sheets, guided interviews and other self-help content that the firm or a client-facing tool shows to the public. One record per page or per guided path.
Used for these tasks
Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.
How AI may be used
AI may list every legal proposition and citation on the page and compare the wording with the last approved version, and a lawyer checks each proposition against the official source.
AI may
- List each statement of law, each citation and each date on the page, with the paragraph number.
- Mark propositions that differ from the last approved version of the page.
- Suggest plain-language rewrites of a sentence the lawyer has already marked as accurate.
AI must not
- Must not mark a proposition correct because it appears in the existing page or in another firm's page.
- Must not add a case, section or form number that the reviewer has not opened.
- Must not publish the page.
The lawyer checks
- Every proposition in the list was checked against the official instrument or the decision, on the date in the record.
- The page says it is general information, names the jurisdiction, and states the date a lawyer last reviewed it.
- The page does not tell the reader what to do in their own matter, and the next-review date is in the diary.
Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.
Read the full text
The full text is available after you log in. It is free. When you log in you can:
- read the whole precedent, with its drafting notes beside it;
- copy it, or download it as a Word file or Markdown;
- add it to your firm’s knowledge base, so colleagues can find it;
- let the AI tools you connect read it from that knowledge base.
The summary, the law it rests on and the AI-use guidance above stay public. Privacy.
More in Client-facing & access-to-justice AI tools
- Chatbot transcript sample review worksheet
- Client notice: how we use AI on your matter, with consent form
- Client consent to input information into a generative AI tool (United States)
- Terms of use and opening disclaimer for a client-facing legal AI assistant
- Client consultation when generative AI affects a significant decision (United States)
- Pre-launch assurance and supervision checklist for client-facing AI tools
- No-advice scope and blocked-topics schedule for a client-facing assistant
- No-advice notice for a client-facing tool (United States)
- Collection notice for AI intake and triage tools (APP 5), with short in-chat version
- Client-facing AI incident and near-miss report
- Note escalating a client-facing tool transcript to a lawyer (United States)
- Periodic supervision minute for a client-facing AI tool
- Human escalation and handoff protocol for client-facing AI tools
- Client letter: using AI tools with your legal matter (confidentiality, privilege and evidence)
All precedents for Client-facing & access-to-justice AI tools · Tasks and AI use in this area