Mark a vessel or facility security plan against the opened statutory items
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Mark whether the draft already names a qualified individual, physical and access controls, a cybersecurity provision, training and unannounced drills, an update at least every five years, and resubmission for a change that may substantially affect security. Write no new plan sentence and do not say the plan will be approved.
- What the lawyer must review
- 46 USC section 70103(c) requires an owner or operator of a vessel or facility described in paragraph (2) to submit a security plan. Paragraph (2) covers vessels and facilities the Secretary believes may be involved in a transportation security incident, and it excludes Department of Defense vessels and facilities. You decide whether this vessel or facility is in that class. Paragraph (3) requires the plan to be consistent with the national and area plans, to identify the qualified individual, to include physical, passenger, cargo, and personnel security, access control, procedural policies, communications, cybersecurity risks that may cause a transportation security incident, and other security systems, to identify security measures, to describe training, periodic unannounced drills, and security actions, to provide a strategy and timeline for that training and those drills, to be updated at least every five years, and to be resubmitted for approval of each change that may substantially affect security. A facility plan is also resubmitted for a change in ownership or operator that may substantially affect security. The Secretary reviews, may require amendments, and approves a plan that meets the subsection. Part 104 of title 33 of the CFR was not opened. The tool does not write the plan and does not predict approval. Opinion 512.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
- Verify dates, people and sequence against contemporaneous records. Preserve uncertainty and identify gaps or conflicting accounts.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.