Review a maritime security plan before submission or after a change in operations
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the current security plan, the operator’s operations description and any change (new berth, vessel, cargo type, contractor), map each plan section to the matters the regime requires and list sections that no longer match operations.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer confirms the client is a participant that must have an approved plan, decides whether the change requires a plan variation or new approval, settles the revised sections with the security officer, and confirms submission to the regulator.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the current security plan, the operator’s operations description and any change (new berth, vessel, cargo type, contractor), map each plan section to the matters the regime requires and list sections that no longer match operations. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the client’s participant category under the Act.
- Check each operational change against the plan sections it affects.
- Keep security-sensitive content within the approved handling arrangements, including any tool use.
Sources
- Cyber and Infrastructure Security Centre, Maritime legislation, regulation and compliance · 2026-10-18
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.