Prepare investigation findings without a credibility conclusion from the tool
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- List each allegation, the documents the lawyer has marked, and the interview notes the lawyer has marked. Write no finding and make no comment on credibility.
- What the lawyer must review
- You write the findings. You decide what is proved and whether a witness is believed. Formal Opinion 512: a generated conclusion is not your judgment, and uncritical reliance can fail Model Rule 1.1. Nothing in the list is copied into the findings unless you write it. Model Rule 1.6: keep the file out of a public tool.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.