Build an allegation chronology from the documents the lawyer allows
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Build a dated chronology of the allegations and the documents the lawyer has marked as usable, and flag an allegation with no document.
- What the lawyer must review
- The chronology is an organizing aid. You decide what the documents show and what may be used. Formal Opinion 512: check a generated chronology against the documents before you rely on it. Model Rule 1.6: personnel and investigation files do not go into a public tool. The chronology is not a finding.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes summarising source material and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Verify dates, people and sequence against contemporaneous records. Preserve uncertainty and identify gaps or conflicting accounts.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.