Check a court document against the judiciary's AI guidance and Ayinde before filing
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Extract the court or tribunal, the document type, and a table of every authority, quotation and factual assertion for the lawyer to verify.
- What the lawyer must review
- Open each authority in legislation.gov.uk, Find Case Law, the official Law Reports or a reputable publisher's database (Ayinde at [7]). Confirm each is genuine, relevant, has a verifiable citation and supports the point (SRA warning notice; Code paras 2.4 and 2.7). No Australian AI practice note applies.
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes organising research leads and extracting and organising information. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.