Jurisdiction

New Zealand

New Zealand practising lawyers and work in New Zealand courts and tribunals Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008 Courts of New Zealand generative-AI guidelines for lawyers (7 December 2023) and the courts and tribunals listed in those guidelines New Zealand Law Society generative-AI guidance (March 2024) Privacy Act 2020 and the Privacy Commissioner's AI guidance Trust-account rules and AML/CFT duties for lawyers who are reporting entities Courts of New Zealand guidelines for judges, judicial officers and support staff, and the separate guidelines for non-lawyers (7 December 2023). New Zealand Law Society AI Hub, including the AI-use checklist and the profession-wide AI research project. Office of the Privacy Commissioner guidance that all 13 Information Privacy Principles apply to AI tools. New Zealand Public Service AI Framework.

Lawyers are regulated under the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. The New Zealand Law Society Te Kāhui Ture o Aotearoa runs practising certificates, the Lawyers Complaints Service and the trust-account Inspectorate. Conduct standards: the Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008. Section 4 sets fundamental duties, including upholding the rule of law and protecting client interests. No statute regulates generative AI generally. For court and tribunal work, start with the Courts of New Zealand lawyer guidelines (7 December 2023). You must not mislead the court, and you must check information, including citations, before you use it. The Law Society's March 2024 guidance: you remain responsible for work a tool produces. Misuse can breach rr 3, 10.9 and 13.1; poor supervision rr 11 and 11.1; client material in a public tool Chapter 8. The Privacy Act 2020 applies to agencies using AI. The Privacy Commissioner expects a privacy impact assessment, human review, and no personal input unless the provider will not retain or disclose it. IPP 3A has applied since 1 May 2026.

AI instruments

Courts

Courts for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Guidelines for judges, judicial officers, tribunal members and support staff on generative AIJudicial guidelineSecondary sourceUnverified dateDB already holds the lawyers set; this adds the judiciary and non-lawyer sets.Secondary. Guides judicial officers and lawyers. Not a court practice note.Courts of New Zealandissued (one of three final sets) · Effective 2023-12-07Final guidelines for the judiciary, issued with separate sets for lawyers and non-lawyers after consultation.Courts of New Zealand
Guidelines for non-lawyers on generative AI in courts and tribunalsCourt guidePrimary sourceUnverified dateFetched via Jus Mundi copy; link the courtsofnz.govt.nz page as primary.Secondary. Written for self-represented litigants.Courts of New Zealandissued · Effective 2023-12-07Guidance for self-represented litigants and other non-lawyers.Courts of New Zealand
Guidelines for use of generative AI in courts and tribunals – lawyersPractice guidelinesCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.Courts of New Zealand2023-12-07Judiciary guidelines for lawyers using GenAI in court and tribunal work: lawyers remain responsible for accuracy, confidentiality and citations.
  • Companion to the non-lawyer and judicial guidelines
Courts of New Zealand

Regulators

Regulators for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Artificial intelligence and the Information Privacy PrinciplesRegulator guidanceSecondary sourceSecondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)updated guidance (builds on May 2023 generative AI guidance)All 13 IPPs apply to developing and using AI tools in NZ, including tools supplied by overseas organisations; OPC recommends a privacy impact assessment.
  • Primary: https://www.privacy.org.nz/resources-and-learning/a-z-topics/ai/
Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)

Law societies and bars

Law societies and bars for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
AI Hub (guidance, AI-use checklist, case rulings)Law society resourcePrimary sourceProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law Societylive resourceCurated AI resources: Law Society generative AI guidance, a checklist from exploration/procurement to use, and court rulings on lawyers' responsibility for AI material.New Zealand Law Society
Generative AI guidance for lawyersGuidanceLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law Society2023-06-15NZLS guidance on what GenAI is and the professional risks lawyers must manage; draws on the Law Society of England and Wales guidance.
  • Not a substitute for legal or technical advice
New Zealand Law Society
Lawyers are responsible for the contents of court documents prepared using Generative AIStatementLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law SocietyNot statedNZLS statement that lawyers are responsible for court documents prepared with GenAI and firms need clear AI policies and quality assurance.
  • Firms should have AI policies for all staff
New Zealand Law Society

Privacy regulators

Privacy regulators for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Generative Artificial Intelligence – expectations for agenciesPrivacy guidancePrivacy regulatorPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)Not statedPrivacy Commissioner expectations for agencies (including law firms) using generative AI tools under the Privacy Act 2020.
  • Lists privacy risks to assess before using a GenAI tool
Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)

Government

Government for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Public Service AI FrameworkGovernment guidanceSecondary sourceSecondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.NZ Government (GCDO / digital.govt.nz)not stated on page readFramework for responsible AI use across the NZ public service.NZ Government (GCDO / digital.govt.nz)

Other instruments

Other instruments for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Profession-wide AI research project and surveyresearchSecondary sourceSecondary. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law Societyreported by LexisNexis NZSurvey of how NZ lawyers use AI, prompted in part by a fabricated AI-cited case the Law Society library could not find.New Zealand Law Society

Every stored instrument

This is the catalogue for New Zealand. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.

AI instruments for New Zealand
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Guidelines for judges, judicial officers, tribunal members and support staff on generative AIJudicial guidelineSecondary sourceUnverified dateDB already holds the lawyers set; this adds the judiciary and non-lawyer sets.Secondary. Guides judicial officers and lawyers. Not a court practice note.Courts of New Zealandissued (one of three final sets) · Effective 2023-12-07Final guidelines for the judiciary, issued with separate sets for lawyers and non-lawyers after consultation.Courts of New Zealand
Guidelines for non-lawyers on generative AI in courts and tribunalsCourt guidePrimary sourceUnverified dateFetched via Jus Mundi copy; link the courtsofnz.govt.nz page as primary.Secondary. Written for self-represented litigants.Courts of New Zealandissued · Effective 2023-12-07Guidance for self-represented litigants and other non-lawyers.Courts of New Zealand
AI Hub (guidance, AI-use checklist, case rulings)Law society resourcePrimary sourceProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law Societylive resourceCurated AI resources: Law Society generative AI guidance, a checklist from exploration/procurement to use, and court rulings on lawyers' responsibility for AI material.New Zealand Law Society
Profession-wide AI research project and surveyresearchSecondary sourceSecondary. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law Societyreported by LexisNexis NZSurvey of how NZ lawyers use AI, prompted in part by a fabricated AI-cited case the Law Society library could not find.New Zealand Law Society
Artificial intelligence and the Information Privacy PrinciplesRegulator guidanceSecondary sourceSecondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)updated guidance (builds on May 2023 generative AI guidance)All 13 IPPs apply to developing and using AI tools in NZ, including tools supplied by overseas organisations; OPC recommends a privacy impact assessment.
  • Primary: https://www.privacy.org.nz/resources-and-learning/a-z-topics/ai/
Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)
Public Service AI FrameworkGovernment guidanceSecondary sourceSecondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.NZ Government (GCDO / digital.govt.nz)not stated on page readFramework for responsible AI use across the NZ public service.NZ Government (GCDO / digital.govt.nz)
Guidelines for use of generative AI in courts and tribunals – lawyersPractice guidelinesCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.Courts of New Zealand2023-12-07Judiciary guidelines for lawyers using GenAI in court and tribunal work: lawyers remain responsible for accuracy, confidentiality and citations.
  • Companion to the non-lawyer and judicial guidelines
Courts of New Zealand
Generative AI guidance for lawyersGuidanceLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law Society2023-06-15NZLS guidance on what GenAI is and the professional risks lawyers must manage; draws on the Law Society of England and Wales guidance.
  • Not a substitute for legal or technical advice
New Zealand Law Society
Lawyers are responsible for the contents of court documents prepared using Generative AIStatementLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.New Zealand Law SocietyNot statedNZLS statement that lawyers are responsible for court documents prepared with GenAI and firms need clear AI policies and quality assurance.
  • Firms should have AI policies for all staff
New Zealand Law Society
Generative Artificial Intelligence – expectations for agenciesPrivacy guidancePrivacy regulatorPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)Not statedPrivacy Commissioner expectations for agencies (including law firms) using generative AI tools under the Privacy Act 2020.
  • Lists privacy risks to assess before using a GenAI tool
Office of the Privacy Commissioner (NZ)

Before the work starts

Guidance
TopicGuidance
Define the matterConfirm the client’s instructions, jurisdiction, intended output and the information available before dividing the work.
Verify the authoritiesOpen each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
Preserve the witness’s evidenceConfirm each factual assertion with the witness and original record. Preserve the witness’s own knowledge and words, and check the court’s rules for this document.
JurisdictionApply this guidance to the actual matter and jurisdiction. Confirm current requirements before relying on an example.
What to open first
  • For a court or tribunal document: the Courts of New Zealand lawyer guidelines (7 December 2023). Check the forum is on the list at the end of the PDF.
  • The Law Society generative-AI guidance (March 2024).
  • The Conduct and Client Care Rules that attach to your practising certificate.
  • Do not apply an Australian court AI practice note to a New Zealand filing.
Court and tribunal AI rules
  • Courts covered: Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, District Court and listed specialist courts, including the Family, Youth, Employment, Environment, Coroners and Māori Land Courts.
  • Tribunals covered: the Waitangi Tribunal and listed tribunals, including the Disputes, Tenancy, Immigration and Protection, and Human Rights Review Tribunals and the Taxation Review Authority.
  • Chatbots are not search engines. The judiciary says they appear to have had limited access to New Zealand law and procedure.
  • You are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file, including citations. Chatbots can invent cases and quotes, apply overseas law and confirm their own inventions.
  • Generally enter nothing that is not already public. Never enter private, confidential, suppressed or privileged information. Report a suppression breach to the registry promptly.
  • You need not disclose GenAI use unless the court or tribunal asks.
  • Chatbots generally do not account for Māori and Pasifika cultural values and practices. Treat this as a bias risk.
Professional-conduct rules
  • The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008 apply to tool use, including the duty not to mislead the court (r 13.1).
  • Advice or work product from a tool is still your responsibility.
  • Misuse can breach r 3 (competence), r 10.9 (misleading conduct) and r 13.1 (fidelity to the court). Supervision failures engage rr 11 and 11.1.
  • Client or privileged material in a public tool may breach Chapter 8. Consider client consent. Test with fictional data.
  • Tell the client, where appropriate, how a tool is used (rr 3.5 and 7.1). Review time-and-attendance billing.
  • Complaints go to the Law Society's Lawyers Complaints Service.
Privacy and confidentiality
  • The Privacy Act 2020 applies to everyone using AI tools in New Zealand. Do a privacy impact assessment first and keep it current.
  • IPP 12 applies when prompts or outputs leave New Zealand. Confirm where the vendor stores and processes data.
  • The Commissioner expects leadership approval, a necessity review, plain-language transparency, engagement with Māori on taonga information, access and correction (IPPs 6 and 7) and human review.
  • Do not enter personal or confidential information unless the provider has confirmed it will not retain or disclose it.
  • IPP 3A (notification of indirect collection) has applied since 1 May 2026.
  • Public-service guidance on digital.govt.nz advises against putting personal and client information into external AI tools.
Review checklist
  • Confirm the court or tribunal is covered by the 7 December 2023 guidelines.
  • Check every output and citation in a trusted source, not another generative tool.
  • Open each Act or rule on legislation.govt.nz; confirm the version at the material date.
  • Keep private, confidential, suppressed and privileged material out of public tools. Turn off chat history where you can.
  • Keep affidavits in the witness's words. No invented facts, witnesses or police testimony.
  • Confirm supervised staff were authorised to use the tool and told their supervisor.
  • Be ready to tell the court which parts used a tool and how they were checked.
  • For personal information, record the privacy impact assessment and the IPP 12 position.
Regulator and Law Society guidance
  • Start with the Law Society AI Hub: the March 2024 guidance, the court PDF, the Privacy Commissioner's AI pages and National Cyber Security Centre material on agentic AI.
  • The Law Society Library will check AI-generated case citations.
  • The Hub's case-law list shows overseas decisions; New Zealand cases will be added. Do not cite a New Zealand fabricated-citation judgment you have not opened.
Firm obligations that sit beside the file
  • Trust accounts: Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 ss 110–116 and the Trust Account Regulations 2008. Read the Law Society page and the 2024 Trust Accounting Guidelines.
  • Barristers cannot operate a trust account or hold fees in advance, except through an instructing solicitor's trust account or escrow.
  • Lawyers providing designated services are reporting entities under the AML/CFT Act 2009, supervised by the Department of Internal Affairs. Check the DIA page for current guidance.
  • Customer risk-rating records have been required since 1 June 2025. A tool must not make the final CDD or SAR decision.

Checks to carry into the matter

  1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
  2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
  3. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Limits on AI assistance

  • Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.

What changes in New Zealand

What changes in New Zealand
Practice areaWhat changes hereOpen
Commercial Litigation & Dispute ResolutionConfirm the forum is listed in the 7 December 2023 guidelines Verify every citation Do not apply an Australian AI practice note Disclose AI use only if the court asksOpen
Residential Conveyancing & PropertyCertify yourself: you are personally responsible under s 27 of the Land Transfer Act 2017 Confirm s 30 evidence is held Do not treat the checklist as the certificationOpen
Commercial Property & LeasingFollow LINZ certify-and-sign requirements and s 27 of the Land Transfer Act 2017 Check that a sole practitioner has linked an attorney to Landonline in case of incapacityOpen
Construction & InfrastructurePrepare the claim under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 Do not use a NSW claim form or an East Coast SOP due date Check retention money: the rules from 5 October 2023 do not apply to homeowner contractsOpen
Employment & Workplace RelationsRun the grievance under the Employment Relations Act 2000, starting with mediation Confirm the path: the Authority, then challenge to the Employment Court Do not use Form F2 or the Fair Work high-income thresholdOpen
Family LawDraft under the Care of Children Act 2004 for the Family Court Remove 'parental responsibility', live-with/spend-time labels and FCFCOA forms Keep children's locations out of public toolsOpen
Personal Injury & CompensationCheck ACC cover first Do not plead compensatory damages for a covered injury: ss 317 and 319 generally bar it Do not open a NSW PIC or Victorian TAC fileOpen
Privacy, Data Protection & CyberMap duties to the Privacy Act 2020 IPPs, not APP numbers Include IPP 3A (indirect collection), in force since 1 May 2026 Complete a privacy impact assessment before any generative-AI useOpen
Commercial & Corporate AdvisoryOpen the Companies Act 1993 for director-duty and related-party questions Do not cite s 180, s 588G, s 674 or an ASIC regulatory guideOpen
Banking & FinanceRegister under the Personal Property Securities Act 1999 on the New Zealand PPSR Do not apply Australian PMSI timing Confirm grantor details with the Companies Office, not an ACNOpen
Capital Markets & Securities — ECM/DCM and DisclosureApply the FMCA and NZX rules to continuous disclosure Apply ASX Listing Rules only if the issuer is dual-listed and you have opened them separatelyOpen
Mergers & Acquisitions / Private EquityConfirm clearance is voluntary, but the Commission can act if it is not sought Apply the substantial-lessening-of-competition test Do not use ACCC thresholds or the 1 January 2026 Australian start dateOpen
Insolvency, Restructuring & BankruptcyUse the Companies Act 1993 and High Court Rules Do not use Form 509H or the 21-day s 459G period Confirm the current demand form and setting-aside period in the ActOpen
Class Actions / Representative ProceedingsTreat it as a representative proceeding under the High Court Rules 2016; there is no s 33V Open the current Rules and orders already made Treat Law Commission work as reform onlyOpen
Financial Services RegulationMap licensing to the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 and the FMA Do not use an AFSL, Australian responsible-manager proof or ASIC Form FS01Open
Competition & Consumer LawApply voluntary clearance and the substantial-lessening-of-competition test Do not apply the Australian 'void acquisition' rule unless a New Zealand provision says soOpen
Immigration & Migration LawOpen the Immigration Act 2009 and current INZ instructions Do not use subclass 189, 482 or 866, or an Australian points tableOpen
Administrative & Public LawDo not use the ART Identify the tribunal the Act names (IPT, Taxation Review Authority and others) Otherwise use High Court judicial review Use the Official Information Act 1982 for official informationOpen
Planning & EnvironmentApply the Resource Management Act 1991 to planning questions Confirm appeals go to the Environment Court Do not use an LEP, a VPP or an EPBC referral as the New Zealand pathOpen
Strata & Community TitlesApply the Unit Titles Act 2010; MBIE is the regulator Do not apply a NSW strata Act, Victorian owners-corporation Act or Queensland moduleOpen
Climate, ESG & Sustainability ReportingApply Part 7A FMCA and XRB standards for years from 1 January 2023 Check GHG assurance for years ending on or after 27 October 2024 Accept AASB S2 only under an FMA exemptionOpen
Government Procurement & TenderingOpen the current Government Procurement Rules; a 'must' Rule is compulsory Do not apply the Commonwealth Procurement Rules Apply the Construction Contracts Act 2002 as wellOpen
SuperannuationOpen the KiwiSaver Act 2006 and the scheme rules Do not draft an SIS Act binding nomination or Australian BDBNOpen
Wills, Estates, Probate & SuccessionApply the Wills Act 2007; most new powers do not reach wills made before 1 November 2007 Check whether marriage or civil union revoked a will not made in contemplation of it Check for Family Protection Act and Property (Relationships) Act claimsOpen
Trust accounting & handling client moneyApply LCA 2006 ss 110–116 and the 2008 Trust Account Regulations Confirm no barrister operates a trust account Do not apply a state rule or IOLTA Sign the reconciliation yourself; a generated one is not the signed positionOpen
Confidentiality & client informationFollow the court guidelines and Chapter 8: generally nothing that is not public Check IPP 12 for overseas processing Consider client consent Test with fictional dataOpen
Client-facing & access-to-justice AI toolsAccept that you remain responsible for the service Say in client-care information who does the work and how Complete a privacy impact assessment; do not test with client data Require human review before actingOpen
Incoming evidence — deepfakes & synthetic documentsTreat generated multimedia as possibly fake, as the court guidelines warn Decide authenticity yourself, with an expert if needed Keep evidence out of public toolsOpen
AI decision systemsConfirm leadership approval and a privacy impact assessment Engage with Māori where taonga information is affected Require human review; apply IPPs 8 and 10 Do not apply an Australian ADM BillOpen
Costs, billing & litigation fundingApply Chapters 3 and 9 of the Rules, including the reasonable-fee factors Decide whether time-and-attendance still fits if a tool does the work Tell the client where appropriateOpen
Arbitration & Alternative Dispute ResolutionApply Schedule 1 of the Arbitration Act 1996 Check Schedule 2: opt-in for international, opt-out for other NZ-seat arbitrations Do not use Australian Act defaults Check each article numberOpen
Energy, Resources & MiningSearch NZP&M permits under the Crown Minerals Act 1991 Do not search a state tenement register, Native Title Vision or EPBC history Check NZP&M law changes if the file involves petroleum or decommissioningOpen
Franchising & DistributionDo not prepare a statutory disclosure document; a 2009 review rejected franchise-specific rules Apply the Fair Trading Act 1986 and the Commission's unconscionable-conduct pageOpen
Maritime, Shipping & TransportApply s 209 of the Maritime Transport Act 1994: Amended Hague Rules (Schedule 5) Do not apply Australian COGSA or the repealed 1979 Act Check the time barOpen

Related tasks

Related tools