Verify a Victorian Supreme Court document under SC Gen 25
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Extract citations, quotes and factual propositions from a draft court document into a list for human verification.
- What the lawyer must review
- Have the lawyer, or the court user responsible, complete the verification
- Do not count a second model's confirmation
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Supreme Court of Victoria
Produce. A verification list and a record of how each item was checked.
Have ready. The draft court document; SC Gen 25; AustLII or an official legislation source.
Example of the limit. A quote that is “close enough” is corrected against the judgment or removed.
Stop and hand it back when
- The only check was another AI tool.
- The document is an affidavit and it no longer reads as the witness’s own words.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-09-22.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Extract citations, quotes and factual propositions from a draft court document into a list for human verification. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm the forum is the Supreme Court of Victoria and the note in force is SC Gen 25.
- Fact-check and proofread. Verify each authority and quote in a trusted source.
- Do not use one AI tool to confirm another.
- Keep a note of which parts used AI, in case the Court asks.
Sources
- Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC Gen 25 · 2026-09-22
Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.