Check references in a Queensland submission before filing

MaintainedLast reviewed

Key facts

Human involvement
RedLawyer-led
How AI is used
Extract every case, statute and pinpoint from a draft submission into a list for the lawyer to open.
What the lawyer must review
Do not file while any reference has been checked only by the tool that drafted it
Written for / version
Queensland versionQLDNZACTCthNSWNTSATASUSVICWA

Rules that apply

The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.

The work product

Forum. The Queensland court or tribunal whose accuracy direction applies

Produce. A reference list with the source the lawyer opened beside each item.

Have ready. The draft submission; The accuracy direction for that court; AustLII or the Queensland legislation site.

Example of the limit. A medium-neutral citation that does not resolve is deleted or corrected from the real judgment.

Stop and hand it back when

  • You have not identified which Queensland court’s direction applies.
  • A reference remains unverified.
  • The only name on the submission is the firm’s.
  • A reference has not been opened by the person who will be named.
  • One QLD variant. Accuracy of references plus PD 5 of 2025: name the individual practitioner, not the firm.

Sources for this task were checked on 2026-09-22.

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceSupporting preparation only. Extract every case, statute and pinpoint from a draft submission into a list for the lawyer to open. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
LawyerPerform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Checklist

  1. Name the court and open its accuracy direction.
  2. Extract every reference, including pinpoints.
  3. Open each one in a trusted source and match the proposition.
  4. The lawyer settles the submission after that check.

Sources

Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.

One QLD variant. Accuracy of references plus PD 5 of 2025: name the individual practitioner, not the firm.

Suggested working checks from the linked public source. Read that source before you rely on the check. This is not a record that the check has been done.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions