Jurisdiction

Singapore

Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court Users (Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024) Guide for Using Generative AI in the Legal Sector

Courts guide applies from 1 October 2024; Ministry of Law sector guide launched 6 March 2026.

AI instruments

Courts

Courts for Singapore
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024 (Guide on generative AI tools applies)Registrar circularCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Supreme Court of Singapore2024-09-23 (effective 2024-10-01) · Effective 2024-10-01Registrar’s Circular No. 1 of 2024, dated 23 September 2024. The circular says the Guide applies to all Supreme Court matters from 1 October 2024. The Guide itself also covers the State Courts and the Family Justice Courts.
  • Applies to all matters in the Supreme Court with effect from 1 October 2024
  • The Guide’s own text also applies to the State Courts and the Family Justice Courts
Supreme Court of Singapore
Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court Users (Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024)Court guidePrimary sourcePractice note. Guides court users. Not a court practice note.Supreme Court of Singapore / Singapore Courtsapplies from · Effective 2024-10-01Neutral stance on GenAI; court users are fully responsible for content and must verify references exist and support the propositions cited.
  • Must be prepared to identify AI-generated portions and explain verification if asked.
  • Applies to Supreme Court, State Courts and Family Justice Courts.
Supreme Court of Singapore / Singapore Courts

Law societies and bars

Law societies and bars for Singapore
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Advisory on the Use of Publicly Available AI ToolsAdvisoryLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Law Society of Singapore2026-04-02Advisory warning members that public AI tools may expose confidential information and recommending paid or enterprise versions for professional work.
  • Recommends paid/enterprise AI tools for legal work
  • Highlights confidentiality risks of public tools
Law Society of Singapore

Privacy regulators

Privacy regulators for Singapore
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Advisory Guidelines on Use of Personal Data in Generative AIPrivacy guidancePrivacy regulatorPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Personal Data Protection CommissionNot statedPDPC guidance on applying the PDPA across the generative AI lifecycle, allocation of responsibilities and handling individuals’ requests.
  • Covers allocation of data protection responsibilities across the GenAI lifecycle
Personal Data Protection Commission
Advisory Guidelines on Use of Personal Data in AI Recommendation and Decision SystemsPrivacy guidancePrivacy regulatorPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumUnverified dateRelease date not captured on page.Secondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.Personal Data Protection CommissionNot statedPDPC guidelines on using personal data to develop and deploy AI recommendation and decision systems.
  • Companion to the GenAI advisory guidelines
Personal Data Protection Commission

Government

Government for Singapore
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AIFrameworkGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.AI Verify Foundation / IMDA2024-05-30Singapore’s nine-dimension framework for trusted generative AI development and deployment; voluntary.
  • Nine dimensions incl. accountability, data, trusted development, incident reporting, testing, security, content provenance
AI Verify Foundation / IMDA

Every stored instrument

This is the catalogue for Singapore. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.

AI instruments for Singapore
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024 (Guide on generative AI tools applies)Registrar circularCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Supreme Court of Singapore2024-09-23 (effective 2024-10-01) · Effective 2024-10-01Registrar’s Circular No. 1 of 2024, dated 23 September 2024. The circular says the Guide applies to all Supreme Court matters from 1 October 2024. The Guide itself also covers the State Courts and the Family Justice Courts.
  • Applies to all matters in the Supreme Court with effect from 1 October 2024
  • The Guide’s own text also applies to the State Courts and the Family Justice Courts
Supreme Court of Singapore
Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court Users (Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024)Court guidePrimary sourcePractice note. Guides court users. Not a court practice note.Supreme Court of Singapore / Singapore Courtsapplies from · Effective 2024-10-01Neutral stance on GenAI; court users are fully responsible for content and must verify references exist and support the propositions cited.
  • Must be prepared to identify AI-generated portions and explain verification if asked.
  • Applies to Supreme Court, State Courts and Family Justice Courts.
Supreme Court of Singapore / Singapore Courts
Advisory on the Use of Publicly Available AI ToolsAdvisoryLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Law Society of Singapore2026-04-02Advisory warning members that public AI tools may expose confidential information and recommending paid or enterprise versions for professional work.
  • Recommends paid/enterprise AI tools for legal work
  • Highlights confidentiality risks of public tools
Law Society of Singapore
Advisory Guidelines on Use of Personal Data in Generative AIPrivacy guidancePrivacy regulatorPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Personal Data Protection CommissionNot statedPDPC guidance on applying the PDPA across the generative AI lifecycle, allocation of responsibilities and handling individuals’ requests.
  • Covers allocation of data protection responsibilities across the GenAI lifecycle
Personal Data Protection Commission
Advisory Guidelines on Use of Personal Data in AI Recommendation and Decision SystemsPrivacy guidancePrivacy regulatorPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumUnverified dateRelease date not captured on page.Secondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.Personal Data Protection CommissionNot statedPDPC guidelines on using personal data to develop and deploy AI recommendation and decision systems.
  • Companion to the GenAI advisory guidelines
Personal Data Protection Commission
Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AIFrameworkGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.AI Verify Foundation / IMDA2024-05-30Singapore’s nine-dimension framework for trusted generative AI development and deployment; voluntary.
  • Nine dimensions incl. accountability, data, trusted development, incident reporting, testing, security, content provenance
AI Verify Foundation / IMDA

Before the work starts

Guidance
TopicGuidance
Secondary sourcesA row marked Secondary source was not confirmed from the primary page. Retrieve that page before you rely on it.
JurisdictionConfirm the current instrument before reliance.

Checks to carry into the matter

  1. Open the instrument that applies to this forum before you rely on it.
  2. Treat a row marked Secondary source as a lead, and retrieve the primary page.
  3. Do not apply another forum’s court note as if it bound this one.

Limits on AI assistance

  • Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.

Sources