Jurisdiction
South Africa
Courts have sanctioned fictitious AI citations (e.g. Mavundla, 2025); LPC ICT guide covers AI.
Choose a practice area AI practice notes by Australian court AI rules tracker by Australian court and body
Court AI rule changes + new tools, monthly
One email a month when a court changes its AI practice note or a tool is added to the catalogue. Your address is kept for that note. See Privacy.
Related jurisdictions
AI instruments
RegulatorsOther instrumentsAI practice notes by Australian court Practice areas
Regulators
| Instrument | Issuer | Date on page | What it says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guide: ICT for practice and cyber law (incl. AI and hallucinations) | Legal Practice Council (South Africa) | per PDF path · Effective 2026-03 | LPC training guide with sections on AI developments, judgments on AI and AI hallucinations. | Legal Practice Council (South Africa) |
Other instruments
| Instrument | Issuer | Date on page | What it says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mavundla v MEC: Department of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs [2025] ZAKZPHC 2 | High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg) | per citation (2025) | Judgment addressing fictitious case citations in a leave-to-appeal application; practitioner duty not to mislead the court. | High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg) |
Every stored instrument
This is the catalogue for South Africa. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.
| Instrument | Issuer | Date on page | What it says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guide: ICT for practice and cyber law (incl. AI and hallucinations) | Legal Practice Council (South Africa) | per PDF path · Effective 2026-03 | LPC training guide with sections on AI developments, judgments on AI and AI hallucinations. | Legal Practice Council (South Africa) |
| Mavundla v MEC: Department of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs [2025] ZAKZPHC 2 | High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg) | per citation (2025) | Judgment addressing fictitious case citations in a leave-to-appeal application; practitioner duty not to mislead the court. | High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg) |
Before the work starts
| Topic | Guidance |
|---|---|
| Define the matter | Confirm the client’s instructions, jurisdiction, intended output and the information available before dividing the work. |
| Confirm the source material | Check the work against the original records and identify omissions, contradictions and remaining information. |
| Record review and approval | Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use. |
| Jurisdiction | Apply this guidance to the actual matter and jurisdiction. Confirm current requirements before relying on an example. |
Limits on AI assistance
- Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.