Jurisdiction

South Africa

Courts have sanctioned fictitious AI citations (e.g. Mavundla, 2025); LPC ICT guide covers AI.

AI instruments

Regulators

Regulators for South Africa
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Guide: ICT for practice and cyber law (incl. AI and hallucinations)Regulator guidancePrimary sourceProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Legal Practice Council (South Africa)per PDF path · Effective 2026-03LPC training guide with sections on AI developments, judgments on AI and AI hallucinations.Legal Practice Council (South Africa)

Other instruments

Other instruments for South Africa
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Mavundla v MEC: Department of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs [2025] ZAKZPHC 2judgmentSecondary sourceSecondary. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg)per citation (2025)Judgment addressing fictitious case citations in a leave-to-appeal application; practitioner duty not to mislead the court.High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg)

Every stored instrument

This is the catalogue for South Africa. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.

AI instruments for South Africa
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Guide: ICT for practice and cyber law (incl. AI and hallucinations)Regulator guidancePrimary sourceProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Legal Practice Council (South Africa)per PDF path · Effective 2026-03LPC training guide with sections on AI developments, judgments on AI and AI hallucinations.Legal Practice Council (South Africa)
Mavundla v MEC: Department of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs [2025] ZAKZPHC 2judgmentSecondary sourceSecondary. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg)per citation (2025)Judgment addressing fictitious case citations in a leave-to-appeal application; practitioner duty not to mislead the court.High Court, KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg)

Before the work starts

Guidance
TopicGuidance
Define the matterConfirm the client’s instructions, jurisdiction, intended output and the information available before dividing the work.
Confirm the source materialCheck the work against the original records and identify omissions, contradictions and remaining information.
Record review and approvalResolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.
JurisdictionApply this guidance to the actual matter and jurisdiction. Confirm current requirements before relying on an example.

Limits on AI assistance

  • Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.

Related tools