Sort a police-issued protection from a court application
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the instrument as served, extract the issuer, the start time, the end date, the named persons, the conditions, and whether the document itself says the matter will be listed in court. Do not classify the instrument. Leave a row for the lawyer's classification.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether this document is itself the protection or only a step toward a court order, whether an exclusion applies, and what the client must do before the end date.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the instrument as served, extract the issuer, the start time, the end date, the named persons, the conditions, and whether the document itself says the matter will be listed in court. Do not classify the instrument. Leave a row for the lawyer's classification. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Do not treat every police document as a court application. In Queensland a police protection direction need not go to court.
- Check the exclusions before telling a client a direction was available, including a child named on it and any family law or child protection order.
- Record the start as service, or as the officer telling the respondent, not as the date of the incident.
- Other places were not opened. Do not describe their police notices.
Sources
- Queensland Government: Police protection directions · 2026-10-22
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.