Screen an information-sharing request about family-violence risk
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the request and the organisation it would go to, record whether the opened page allows that organisation to share under the scheme, and whether the stated purpose is assessing or managing family violence risk. Leave consent, exclusions and other states blank where the page does not state them. Do not write the request.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether the recipient is a prescribed information sharing entity, whether the request should be made, and what is sent.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the request and the organisation it would go to, record whether the opened page allows that organisation to share under the scheme, and whether the stated purpose is assessing or managing family violence risk. Leave consent, exclusions and other states blank where the page does not state them. Do not write the request. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the recipient is being checked against the prescribed list. The page does not itself name the entities.
- Confirm the purpose on the request is assessing or managing family violence risk.
- Do not add a consent rule or an exclusion. Those were not on the page, and the Ministerial Guidelines were not opened.
- Do not write the request that will be sent.
Sources
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.
Other states' information-sharing schemes were not opened.