Assess whether conduct after a disability complaint is victimisation
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Index the detriment and the threats in the documents the lawyer selects against the grounds in section 42(2)(a) to (g). Record the date of the complaint, proceeding, information, conference, evidence, assertion or allegation the lawyer identifies. The tool does not decide that an offence has been committed and writes nothing that is sent or filed.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether the conduct is victimisation, whether it is an offence, and writes any advice, letter or complaint.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Index the detriment and the threats in the documents the lawyer selects against the grounds in section 42(2)(a) to (g). Record the date of the complaint, proceeding, information, conference, evidence, assertion or allegation the lawyer identifies. The tool does not decide that an offence has been committed and writes nothing that is sent or filed. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Match each alleged detriment to a ground in section 42(2), including a belief that the person has done or proposes to do one of those things.
- Keep the index to documents the lawyer selected. Do not add a ground from another Act.
- Confirm the output contains no advice and no letter. The penalty stated is imprisonment for 6 months, as the section provides.
Sources
- Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 42 · 2026-10-22
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.