Decide whether conduct after a disability complaint is retaliation
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From the documents the lawyer selects, list the complaint or the opposition, its date, who did it, and the later act, with its date and who did it. Do not state that the later act was because of the complaint, and do not write a charge.
- What the lawyer must review
- You decide whether the statute is met, and you write any charge or letter. The tool writes none of it. No person shall discriminate against any individual because that individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the Americans with Disabilities Act chapter, or because that individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under that chapter (42 U.S.C. § 12203(a)). Subsection (b) makes it unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with the exercise of a right granted or protected by the chapter. The remedies cross-refer to §§ 12117, 12133, and 12188. Those sections were not opened. What counts as discrimination under the chapter includes the employment practices in § 12112, which was opened.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.