Jurisdiction

European Union

EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689) Article 4 – AI literacy EU AI Act Article 5 – Prohibited AI practices EU AI Act Article 50 – Transparency obligations for providers and deployers CCBE guide on the use of generative AI by lawyers

The EU AI Act applies to providers and deployers, including law firms: AI literacy and prohibitions since 2 Feb 2025; transparency duties from 2 Aug 2026. CCBE guidance for lawyers.

AI instruments

Law societies and bars

Law societies and bars for European Union
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
CCBE guide on the use of generative AI by lawyersProfessional guidancePrimary sourceProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropePDF file date in URL · Effective 2025-10-02European bars' guide on GenAI use by lawyers, with references to the EU AI Act and international guidance.Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe

Legislation

Legislation for European Union
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689) Article 4 – AI literacyLegislationPrimary sourceBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Unionin force per Article 113(a) · Effective 2025-02-02Providers and deployers (incl. law firms deploying AI) must take measures to ensure sufficient AI literacy of staff.European Union
EU AI Act Article 5 – Prohibited AI practicesLegislationSecondary sourceUnverified dateCheck the 2 Dec 2026 provisions (possible amendment).Secondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Unionin force per Article 113(a); the page also shows some provisions dated 2 December 2026 · Effective 2025-02-02Lists prohibited AI practices; relevant to advising clients and to firm tools.European Union
EU AI Act Article 50 – Transparency obligations for providers and deployersLegislationPrimary sourceBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Unionin force per Article 113 · Effective 2026-08-02Disclosure duties for AI interacting with people and marking of synthetic content; relevant to client-facing chatbots.European Union
EU AI Act Annex III point 8 – Administration of justice (high-risk)LegislationLegislationPrimary sourceConfidence: highBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Union2027-12-02 (in force) · Effective 2027-12-02Annex III, point 8, classifies as high-risk an AI system used by or on behalf of a judicial authority to research and interpret facts and the law, or to apply the law to facts, and a similar use in alternative dispute resolution. Under Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Chapter III duties for Annex III systems apply from 2 December 2027. The AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024; that is not the application date of these duties.
  • Annex III high-risk duties apply from 2 December 2027 (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, amending Article 113)
  • Annex I embedded high-risk systems are on a later date, 2 August 2028
European Union
EU AI Act Article 26 – Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systemsLegislationLegislationPrimary sourceConfidence: highUnverified dateBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Union2027-12-02 (Annex III application); 2028-08-02 (Annex I application)Article 26 sets duties for deployers of high-risk AI systems, including following the instructions for use, assigning human oversight to competent people, monitoring and keeping logs. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 moved the application of Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, to 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and 2 August 2028 for Annex I systems. Those duties are not in application merely because the Act entered into force on 1 August 2024.
  • Human oversight is assigned to people who have the competence, training and authority to do it
  • For Annex III systems the Article 26 duties apply from 2 December 2027, not from 1 August 2024
European Union
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 amending the AI Act (high-risk deadlines deferred)LegislationLegislationPrimary sourceConfidence: highBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Union2026-07-27 (in force) · Effective 2026-07-27Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the AI Omnibus, in force on 27 July 2026. It amends Article 113 of the AI Act so Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, apply from 2 December 2027 for Annex III high-risk systems and from 2 August 2028 for Annex I systems. Most Article 50 transparency duties are unchanged.
  • Annex III high-risk obligations apply from 2 December 2027
  • Annex I embedded systems apply from 2 August 2028
European Union

Government

Government for European Union
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Timeline for the Implementation of the EU AI ActTimelineGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.European CommissionNot statedCommission timeline for the AI Act. The general application date remains 2 August 2026. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 deferred Chapter III high-risk duties: Annex III from 2 December 2027 and Annex I from 2 August 2028.
  • GPAI provider obligations applied from 2 August 2025
  • Annex III high-risk duties apply from 2 December 2027; Annex I from 2 August 2028
European Commission
AI Literacy – Questions & Answers (Article 4)FAQGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.European CommissionNot statedCommission Q&A on the Article 4 duty for providers and deployers (including law firms) to ensure sufficient AI literacy of staff.
  • Applies since 2 February 2025
European Commission
General-Purpose AI Code of PracticeCode of practiceGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Commission2025-07-10Voluntary code helping GPAI model providers comply with AI Act safety, transparency and copyright duties; confirmed adequate by Commission and AI Board.
  • Relevant to vendor due diligence by law firms
European Commission

International

International for European Union
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
Guidelines on the use of generative AI for courtsGuidelinesInternationalPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.CEPEJ (Council of Europe)2025-12-05CEPEJ guidelines (CEPEJ(2025)18Final) on operational and ethical use of generative AI by courts and judicial professionals. This is a Council of Europe instrument, not an EU regulation.
  • Adopted at the 45th CEPEJ plenary, Strasbourg, 4–5 December 2025
  • Council of Europe guidance. It is not a regulation of the European Union
CEPEJ (Council of Europe)
Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (CETS 225)TreatyInternationalPrimary sourceConfidence: highUnverified dateProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Council of Europe2024-09-05 (opened for signature)Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (CETS 225). It is an international treaty opened for signature on 5 September 2024, not an EU regulation.
  • Opened for signature on 5 September 2024
  • Council of Europe treaty. It is not an act of the European Union
Council of Europe

Every stored instrument

This is the catalogue for European Union. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.

AI instruments for European Union
InstrumentIssuerDate on pageWhat it saysSource
EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689) Article 4 – AI literacyLegislationPrimary sourceBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Unionin force per Article 113(a) · Effective 2025-02-02Providers and deployers (incl. law firms deploying AI) must take measures to ensure sufficient AI literacy of staff.European Union
EU AI Act Article 5 – Prohibited AI practicesLegislationSecondary sourceUnverified dateCheck the 2 Dec 2026 provisions (possible amendment).Secondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Unionin force per Article 113(a); the page also shows some provisions dated 2 December 2026 · Effective 2025-02-02Lists prohibited AI practices; relevant to advising clients and to firm tools.European Union
EU AI Act Article 50 – Transparency obligations for providers and deployersLegislationPrimary sourceBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Unionin force per Article 113 · Effective 2026-08-02Disclosure duties for AI interacting with people and marking of synthetic content; relevant to client-facing chatbots.European Union
CCBE guide on the use of generative AI by lawyersProfessional guidancePrimary sourceProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropePDF file date in URL · Effective 2025-10-02European bars' guide on GenAI use by lawyers, with references to the EU AI Act and international guidance.Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe
EU AI Act Annex III point 8 – Administration of justice (high-risk)LegislationLegislationPrimary sourceConfidence: highBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Union2027-12-02 (in force) · Effective 2027-12-02Annex III, point 8, classifies as high-risk an AI system used by or on behalf of a judicial authority to research and interpret facts and the law, or to apply the law to facts, and a similar use in alternative dispute resolution. Under Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Chapter III duties for Annex III systems apply from 2 December 2027. The AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024; that is not the application date of these duties.
  • Annex III high-risk duties apply from 2 December 2027 (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, amending Article 113)
  • Annex I embedded high-risk systems are on a later date, 2 August 2028
European Union
EU AI Act Article 26 – Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systemsLegislationLegislationPrimary sourceConfidence: highUnverified dateBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Union2027-12-02 (Annex III application); 2028-08-02 (Annex I application)Article 26 sets duties for deployers of high-risk AI systems, including following the instructions for use, assigning human oversight to competent people, monitoring and keeping logs. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 moved the application of Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, to 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and 2 August 2028 for Annex I systems. Those duties are not in application merely because the Act entered into force on 1 August 2024.
  • Human oversight is assigned to people who have the competence, training and authority to do it
  • For Annex III systems the Article 26 duties apply from 2 December 2027, not from 1 August 2024
European Union
Timeline for the Implementation of the EU AI ActTimelineGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.European CommissionNot statedCommission timeline for the AI Act. The general application date remains 2 August 2026. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 deferred Chapter III high-risk duties: Annex III from 2 December 2027 and Annex I from 2 August 2028.
  • GPAI provider obligations applied from 2 August 2025
  • Annex III high-risk duties apply from 2 December 2027; Annex I from 2 August 2028
European Commission
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 amending the AI Act (high-risk deadlines deferred)LegislationLegislationPrimary sourceConfidence: highBinding rule. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Union2026-07-27 (in force) · Effective 2026-07-27Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the AI Omnibus, in force on 27 July 2026. It amends Article 113 of the AI Act so Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, apply from 2 December 2027 for Annex III high-risk systems and from 2 August 2028 for Annex I systems. Most Article 50 transparency duties are unchanged.
  • Annex III high-risk obligations apply from 2 December 2027
  • Annex I embedded systems apply from 2 August 2028
European Union
AI Literacy – Questions & Answers (Article 4)FAQGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.European CommissionNot statedCommission Q&A on the Article 4 duty for providers and deployers (including law firms) to ensure sufficient AI literacy of staff.
  • Applies since 2 February 2025
European Commission
General-Purpose AI Code of PracticeCode of practiceGovernmentPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.European Commission2025-07-10Voluntary code helping GPAI model providers comply with AI Act safety, transparency and copyright duties; confirmed adequate by Commission and AI Board.
  • Relevant to vendor due diligence by law firms
European Commission
Guidelines on the use of generative AI for courtsGuidelinesInternationalPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.CEPEJ (Council of Europe)2025-12-05CEPEJ guidelines (CEPEJ(2025)18Final) on operational and ethical use of generative AI by courts and judicial professionals. This is a Council of Europe instrument, not an EU regulation.
  • Adopted at the 45th CEPEJ plenary, Strasbourg, 4–5 December 2025
  • Council of Europe guidance. It is not a regulation of the European Union
CEPEJ (Council of Europe)
Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (CETS 225)TreatyInternationalPrimary sourceConfidence: highUnverified dateProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.Council of Europe2024-09-05 (opened for signature)Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (CETS 225). It is an international treaty opened for signature on 5 September 2024, not an EU regulation.
  • Opened for signature on 5 September 2024
  • Council of Europe treaty. It is not an act of the European Union
Council of Europe

Before the work starts

Guidance
TopicGuidance
Secondary sourcesA row marked Secondary source was not confirmed from the primary page. Retrieve that page before you rely on it.
JurisdictionConfirm the current instrument before reliance.

Checks to carry into the matter

  1. Open the instrument that applies to this forum before you rely on it.
  2. Treat a row marked Secondary source as a lead, and retrieve the primary page.
  3. Do not apply another forum’s court note as if it bound this one.

Limits on AI assistance

  • Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.

Sources