Jurisdiction

Alaska: AI rules for lawyers

Alaska, United States · Switch state

What this means for lawyers

The Alaska Bar Association has a formal opinion on generative AI (Ethics Opinion 2025-1, adopted by the Board of Governors on 23 April 2025). It applies the existing Alaska Rules of Professional Conduct (ARPC) rather than creating new rules.

Verify all AI output before relying on it, especially citations and quotes. The opinion says lawyers remain responsible for their own work product, whether a human nonlawyer or AI drafted or researched it. It ties this to ARPC 1.1, 1.3, 3.1, 3.3, 4.1 and 8.4.

Before putting client confidences or secrets into a generative AI tool, review the tool's policies on data retention, data sharing and self-learning. To use a self-learning tool outside a closed system, fully anonymise the inputs unless the client gives informed consent.

Check court rules and orders yourself. The opinion tells lawyers to confirm whether and when any court rule or order requires disclosure of AI use. No Alaska court rule or order of that kind was found.

As at .

Telling the court and the client

  • Tell the courtUnclear

    Court disclosure: no rule found. No Alaska state court rule or Supreme Court order, and no District of Alaska general order or local rule, requiring disclosure or certification of AI use was found. The Bar opinion says lawyers should check for any such requirement.

    Client disclosure/consent: depends. Opinion 2025-1 says the duty to tell a client depends on the circumstances (ARPC 1.2, 1.4). A lawyer should answer a client's questions candidly.

    Proactive disclosure may be needed when AI is used in a novel way or for substantive work, is a significant expense, or would breach the engagement terms or the client's reasonable expectations. Informed consent is needed where an AI tool may disclose confidences to third parties.

  • Tell the clientVaries

    Same basis and sources as above.

What changed in Alaska in the last 12 months

No new or changed AI rules recorded for Alaska in the last 12 months.

AI instruments

Full notes

State bar and regulators

Sources

Before the work starts

  • Define the matter

    Confirm the client’s instructions, jurisdiction, intended output and the information available before dividing the work.

  • Confirm the source material

    Check the work against the original records and identify omissions, contradictions and remaining information.

  • Record review and approval

    Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

  • Jurisdiction

    Apply this guidance to the actual matter and jurisdiction. Confirm current requirements before relying on an example.

Limits on AI assistance

  • Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.