Mark gaps in a collection notice used with an AI chatbot
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- List which of the section 1798.100(a) items the current notice does not state: categories, purposes, sale or sharing, sensitive-information categories, and retention. Write no replacement notice and no chatbot label.
- What the lawyer must review
- Section 1798.100(a) requires the notice at or before collection. A chatbot that collects personal information does not change that duty, and no opened statute adds a separate chatbot label. Subsection (c) still requires collection and use to be reasonably necessary and proportionate to the disclosed purpose. You decide whether the current notice is enough and you write any replacement. Opinion 512 and Model Rule 1.6: prompts can contain personal information.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notice at collection | Notice | AI use Yellow | Short notice given at or before the point of collection under Civil Code § 1798.100(a). |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.