Record that the Queensland Civil Liability Act states no mental-harm duty test
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- In a firm-controlled tool, record that the opened table of provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2003 contains no duty section for mental harm and no normal-fortitude test. Leave the duty undecided.
- What the lawyer must review
- Do not apply a normal-fortitude duty test. The opened table states none.
- Decide duty on the law that applies here. This table does not supply that test.
- The absence of a section is not a finding that a duty is owed or is not owed.
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychiatrist's instructions on a recognised psychiatric illness | Letter | AI use Yellow | Letter asking a psychiatrist whether there is a recognised psychiatric illness for a mental harm claim, without asking the psychiatrist to apply the statutory tests. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.