Extract a recreational warning without a statutory risk-warning defence

MaintainedLast reviewed

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
Extract the warning or the signed form in the words on the page, with where it was given and who signed. Do not say whether it excludes the claim.
What the lawyer must review
  • The lawyer decides what effect the words have. Extract them. Do not rewrite them.
  • Do not add a risk-warning defence that removes the duty. The opened sections contain none.
  • Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one.
  • ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
Written for / version
Victoria versionVICNSWQLD

Rules that apply

The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.

The work product

Forum. Victoria. A recreational activity where a warning or signed form is in the brief.

Produce. An extract of the warning or signed form. The lawyer decides its effect.

Have ready. The warning or signed form; Where and when it was given, if a document shows that.

Example of the limit. Illustrative example: A sign at the entry warns of uneven ground. The extract copies the words and the photograph. It does not say the sign removes liability.

Stop and hand it back when

  • The words cannot be read.
  • The tool is asked to say the form excludes the claim.

Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceExtract the warning or the signed form in the words on the page, with where it was given and who signed. Do not say whether it excludes the claim.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Extract the warning or signed form in the words on the page, with where it appears and who signed.
  2. Do not treat the sign as removing the section 14B duty or the section 48 precautions test.
  3. If an obvious-risk point is taken, leave it to section 53 and section 54. Section 54 was not opened.
  4. A consumer-law limit on death or injury is a separate question. That page was not used for this version.

Sources

Do not treat a sign as a statutory defence. No risk-warning section of that kind was in the Wrongs Act sections opened.

If this is filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC Gen 25, issued on 14 May 2026, calls for particular caution with affidavit material and expert reports, and says confidential information should not go into a public AI tool.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions