Review a recreational risk warning and any signed waiver
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Extract the warning or the signed form in the words on the page, with where it was given and who signed. Do not say whether it excludes the claim.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether a warning or a signed form has the effect the other party claims.
- Extract the words. Do not rewrite them and do not say the form is binding.
- Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one.
- ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: NSWVICQLD
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Extract the warning or the signed form in the words on the page, with where it was given and who signed. Do not say whether it excludes the claim. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Quote the sign or the form. Do not paraphrase it into a stronger warning.
- Record who gave the warning, and whether the plaintiff was a child or lacked capacity to understand it.
- In New South Wales check the section 5M limits before treating the warning as effective.
- Do not use the New South Wales section as the rule in Victoria or Queensland.
Sources
- Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) section 5M, AustLII · 2026-10-23
- Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) table of contents · 2026-10-23
- Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) authorised version 130 · 2026-10-23
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.