List each clinician the record names before section 59 is applied
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the treatment records the lawyer has selected, make a table of each person the record names, the role the record gives that person, the place, and the page. Do not decide who is sued.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides who is sued. The list does not decide employment or indemnity.
- Do not name a compulsory recipient of a pre-court notice. No opened section does.
- Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one.
- ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Victoria. Treatment records, before a defendant is chosen.
Produce. A table of clinicians named in the records.
Have ready. Treatment records the lawyer selects; The pages that name each person.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: One operation note names three people and gives a role to two of them. The table has three rows and leaves the third role blank. It names no defendant.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool is asked to choose the defendant.
- A person is added who is not named in the record.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the treatment records the lawyer has selected, make a table of each person the record names, the role the record gives that person, the place, and the page. Do not decide who is sued. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- One row per person the selected record names, with the role, place and page the record gives.
- Section 59 asks the peer question of practitioners in the field of the professional whose service is in issue.
- Do not add an employer, an indemnity scheme, or a defendant. None of those was in the section opened.
- A warning allegation is section 60, not this list.
Sources
- Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) section 59 · 2026-10-23
- Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC Gen 25 · 2026-10-23
No indemnity scheme was opened. The list does not say who must be indemnified.
If this is filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC Gen 25, issued on 14 May 2026, calls for particular caution with affidavit material and expert reports, and says confidential information should not go into a public AI tool.