Index the conviction, plea and sentence remarks for a civil assault claim
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the verdict, the plea and the sentencing remarks the lawyer supplies, build a table with the date, the court, the offence as charged, the plea, and the page of each extract. No narrative, and nothing that is filed.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer checks each row against the page named, and decides what may be used in the civil claim.
- A conviction or a plea is not the civil pleading. Do not treat the table as one.
- Sentencing remarks often contain health information. Keep them in a firm-controlled tool.
- ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. A breach may be notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: NSWVICQLD
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the verdict, the plea and the sentencing remarks the lawyer supplies, build a table with the date, the court, the offence as charged, the plea, and the page of each extract. No narrative, and nothing that is filed. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Check the offence, plea and date against the court document named in the row.
- Put a property order and a personal-injury order on separate rows.
- Do not write a sentence that characterises the assault. The table is extracts and page numbers only.
- In New South Wales, do not describe a restitution order as money the victim has been awarded.
Sources
- Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) s 85B · 2026-10-23
- Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) s 35 · 2026-10-23
- NCAT: Victims recognition payments or restitution orders · 2026-10-23
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.