Check a Victorian journey against the required-to-travel deeming

MaintainedLast reviewed

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the route and the reason for travel, using a firm-controlled tool, table whether the worker was required to travel for work or was travelling to or from the workplace, and any substantial interruption. Do not decide cover.
What the lawyer must review
  • Decide whether the trip is required travel for work.
  • Do not treat travel to and from the workplace as that deeming.
  • A substantial interruption or deviation has to be connected with employment.
  • Health and wage records stay in a firm-controlled tool. Apply ASCR r 9, APP 11, and the notifiable-breach test.
Written for / version
Victoria versionVICNSWQLD

Rules that apply

The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.

The work product

Forum. Victoria, claims manual, travelling for work and attendance at other places

Produce. A route note separating required travel from the commute.

Have ready. Start and end of the trip; Why the worker was travelling; Any stop, and whose purpose it served.

Example of the limit. Illustrative example: A worker is injured driving from home to the usual workplace, after stopping for a personal errand. The note classes the trip as travel to the workplace, which the manual excludes from the required-travel deeming, and records the stop. The lawyer decides. A different mental-injury test is not used.

Stop and hand it back when

  • The purpose of the trip is unknown.
  • The facts are a recess at the workplace rather than a journey.

Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceFrom the route and the reason for travel, using a firm-controlled tool, table whether the worker was required to travel for work or was travelling to or from the workplace, and any substantial interruption. Do not decide cover.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Record whether the employer required the travel, or the worker was only going to or from the workplace.
  2. List every stop and whether it was connected with employment.
  3. Keep a trip to treatment for an existing injury under the separate attendance deeming.
  4. Do not use a real-and-substantial-connection test. The manual does not state one for this journey.

Sources

No generative-AI practice note of the Workplace Injury Commission, Medical Panels or a Victorian court was opened. Apply the forum's current direction before a document is lodged.

The manual cites the Accident Compensation Act beside a current-Act icon. Confirm the current section before quoting a number. The mental-injury directive does not state a journey rule.

If health or wage records leave the firm-controlled tool, decide whether a Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) breach is notifiable.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions