Prepare an ADF member's statement for a service tribunal or inquiry
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- The tool writes nothing in the statement. It may list the documents the member refers to in a strictly tabular, source-tagged list, using only material cleared for that use.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer takes the member's account in their own words, advises on privilege and self-incrimination, and confirms it reflects the member's own recollection before it is signed.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. The tool writes nothing in the statement. It may list the documents the member refers to in a strictly tabular, source-tagged list, using only material cleared for that use. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm no AI-generated sentence, outline or heading appears in the statement.
- Confirm classification of any document referred to before it is attached.
- Read the statement back to the member and record their confirmation.
Sources
- Department of Defence: Military justice system · 2026-10-18
- Inspector-General of the ADF: Frequently asked questions · 2026-10-18
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.