Draft a reportable-situation assessment and s 912D notification
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From the incident facts, build a timeline and draft s 912D notification against the reportable-situation tests (Corporations Act Pt 7.6 Div 3; NCCP Act equivalents).
- What the lawyer must review
- Write every substantive sentence yourself; an error may breach s 1308
- Keep the s 912D and NCCP s 50A tests apart
- Check the investigation trigger (60 days, Instrument 2025/289, from 27 June 2025)
- Check the 30-day reporting clock
- Check privilege and verify the timeline
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
- Verify dates, people and sequence against contemporaneous records. Preserve uncertainty and identify gaps or conflicting accounts.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.