Review advice files against the Pt 7.7A best-interests steps
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Check a sample of statements of advice against the s 961B–s 961H best-interests steps and produce a gap report with file references.
- What the lawyer must review
- Confirm the sample is representative
- Check which DBFO Act 2024 (assent 9 July 2024) changes have commenced
- Test each flagged gap
- If AI wrote the advice, do an independent substantive check
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.