Screen information exchanges between competitors

Key facts

Human involvement: YellowClose supervision
How AI is used: Table who exchanged information, whether it concerns price, output, wages or hiring, and how recent and how specific the notes say it was. Write no legal conclusion.
What the lawyer must review: Sherman Act § 1 is the offence. The January 2025 FTC and DOJ guidelines on workers say information exchanges may indicate wage coordination, and that an agreement can be written or unwritten. The guidelines are the agencies' views. They are not a holding that every exchange of information is a crime. You decide whether the exchange is evidence of an agreement. Opinion 512: verify the table against the documents and do not put them in a public tool.
Written for / version: United States versionUSCth

Who does what

Who does what
Role	What they do
Assistance	Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
Lawyer	Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Forms and precedents for this task
Form or precedent	Kind	AI use	Summary
US antitrust compliance policy	Policy	AI use Yellow	Company policy built around Sherman Act section 1 as opened, including the felony penalty.
US clean team and information exchange protocol	Policy	AI use Yellow	A company protocol for who may see a competitor's information during a transaction or a collaboration.