Compare one injured person's scheme position with a standalone claim
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Set the approved scheme's categories beside the injury, treatment and wage figures the lawyer has accepted for this one person, and list what a Part 3-5 assessment would have to confront under the sections the lawyer names. Do not value either path and do not advise the person to leave the proceeding.
- What the lawyer must review
- Write the comparison. Measure the scheme and a standalone claim on the same heads of loss.
- Do not prefer a path because a published cap looks lower or higher. Read the regime that applies.
- This is not the separate task of advising on opting out. The lawyer owns any advice about leaving the proceeding.
- Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool.
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: NSWVICQLD
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Set the approved scheme's categories beside the injury, treatment and wage figures the lawyer has accepted for this one person, and list what a Part 3-5 assessment would have to confront under the sections the lawyer names. Do not value either path and do not advise the person to leave the proceeding. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Use the scheme categories in the approved scheme, not a generic loss list.
- Put Part VIB on the standalone Part 3-5 side only. Do not apply s 28LE, s 16 or the Queensland injury scale to that side.
- Show any Victoria group-costs percentage as its own line. Do not invent an equivalent percentage in Queensland or New South Wales.
- Do not draft an opt-out notice or advise the person to opt out in this task.
Sources
- Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 87E, 87S, 87M and 87U · 2026-10-23
- Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), s 33ZDA and s 33V · 2026-10-23
- Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld), s 103R · 2026-10-23
- Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 173 · 2026-10-23
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.