Compare a part 13A scheme position with a standalone safety-defect claim
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Set the approved scheme beside this person's figures, and list the Part VIB tests on a standalone Part 3-5 claim. Do not add a percentage group costs line. The part 13A sections opened do not create one. Do not value either path.
- What the lawyer must review
- Write the comparison. Use the same heads of loss on both paths.
- Put Part VIB on the Part 3-5 claim. Do not put the Queensland injury scale on that claim.
- Do not invent a percentage group costs order. Section 103R provides for distribution orders, not that percentage.
- Require section 103R approval for the group settlement.
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Supreme Court of Queensland, part 13A
Produce. The lawyer's comparison for one injured group member, without an invented costs percentage.
Have ready. The approved scheme; This person's figures; The s 103R orders sought.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: The scheme pays by injury category. The lawyer compares that category with a Part VIB assessment and does not insert a percentage costs deduction that part 13A, as opened, does not create.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool writes the advice.
- The injury scale is applied to the Part 3-5 claim.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Set the approved scheme beside this person's figures, and list the Part VIB tests on a standalone Part 3-5 claim. Do not add a percentage group costs line. The part 13A sections opened do not create one. Do not value either path. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Use the categories in the approved scheme.
- Keep s 87S and the indexed s 87M amount on the standalone Part 3-5 side.
- Do not state a current dollar cap.
- Do not draft an opt-out notice in this task.
Sources
- Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld), s 103R · 2026-10-23
- Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 87E and s 87S · 2026-10-23
If a submission is filed in the Supreme Court of Queensland, Practice Direction 5 of 2025 requires a named practitioner to verify the references. It is not a general ban on generative AI.