Compare competing class actions and draft the GPN-CA carriage or consolidation note
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Compare competing filings on group definition, funding, lead plaintiff and proposed orders, and draft a carriage or consolidation note with cites. Re-derive every fact before filing.
- What the lawyer must review
- Use current filed versions
- Apply current GPN-CA and case law on group members' interests
- Apply the court's protocol (the joint Federal Court–Victorian Supreme Court protocol differs)
- Check statements about rival funding
- Include GPN-AI disclosure
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.