Legal-specific · eDiscovery and litigation · Medium confidence

Law In Order (Relativity aiR)

Law In Order Pty Ltd · Law In Order managed RelativityOne and optional Relativity aiR for Review. Other LIO services (court reporting, SmartBundle) are out of scope.

Australian Relativity Gold Partner offering aiR for Review as a managed Azure service with claimed AU data residency and zero data retention. Model providers are Relativity's, not named here.

Opens a private software assessment of Law In Order (Relativity aiR) for one task, with this profile’s questions to hand.

eDiscovery document review
Published facts
DeploymentSaaS
Hosting regionsAustralia, United Kingdom, United States
Australian regionYes
Training on customer contentNo
Retention summaryaiR implementation claimed to use zero data retention. Matter workspace retention not stated.
IntegrationsRelativityOne, Microsoft Azure
Pricing summaryManaged services plus Relativity; no public list prices.
Australian presenceYes — AU residency offered for sovereignty requirements. Some vendors may store in UK/USA.

Product and intended use

Define the configuration, people, information and tasks being assessed.

productPlan

Public claim only

Law In Order Pty Ltd managed eDiscovery/document review as a RelativityOne Gold Partner. Relativity aiR for Review offered as an on-demand service. Other products (SmartBundle, court reporting) need separate review.

Ask: Confirm aiR for Review versus conventional Relativity review on our SOW.

deployment

Public claim only

aiR for Review on Microsoft Azure. For clients with sovereignty requirements, Law In Order says data remains within Australian borders. Relativity Calder7 monitors security.

Ask: Is our RelativityOne tenant in Azure Australia, including aiR inference?

features

Public claim only

Prompt-based classification (relevance/issue/importance) with citations and rationale; QC against reviewer decisions.

Ask: Which aiR modules (Review, Case Strategy)?

Adoption and implementation

Record the practical work needed to introduce and maintain the software.

Quality and human effort

Compare complete work at the required quality, including checking and correction.

qualityEvidence

Public claim only

Explainable results with citations. Compare predictions with reviewer decisions. No independent public accuracy study.

Ask: Precision/recall on a sample of our documents?

Data, controls and requirements

Compare the actual configuration with firm, client and jurisdiction requirements, supported by evidence.

trainingUse

Public claim only

Privacy-first AI and zero data retention policies claimed for the LIO implementation of aiR. Relativity's own terms still apply.

Ask: Confirm ZDR and no-training in both LIO and Relativity paper.

deletion

Public claim only

Personal information deleted or de-identified when no longer required.

Ask: Certified deletion of the Relativity workspace and aiR artifacts?

contract

Not confirmed

Service agreement not scraped. Privacy Act compliance described.

Ask: MSA, DPA, cap, AU law?

incidents

Not confirmed

Privacy complaints process; NDB not explicitly restated in the extract.

Ask: NDB notice to us and OAIC?

Sources

Official pages reviewed for this profile, last reviewed 2026-09-21.

Related tasks

Related tools

Add this product to your toolset for a particular task, or use it with a practice-area checklist. Add to your toolset Practice areas Best AI ediscovery and litigation tools Australia