Compare competing class proceedings and draft the carriage or consolidation note
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Compare competing filings on group definition, funding, lead plaintiff and proposed orders, and draft a carriage or consolidation note with document cites.
- What the lawyer must review
- Use the current filed versions
- Leave carriage and lead-counsel factors to the court
- Re-derive every factual assertion before the note is filed
- Written for / version
- Cth
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.