Compare a workplace policy to the applicable discrimination duties
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Map the client's policy against the lawyer-selected duty checklist; list gaps, conflicts with other policies, and practices on file that do not match the policy.
- What the lawyer must review
- Build the duty checklist from the current statute and any binding standard
- Check actual practice; policy language is not compliance if practice differs
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Map the client's policy against the lawyer-selected duty checklist; list gaps, conflicts with other policies, and practices on file that do not match the policy. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare a workplace policy with the duties opened for this file | Checklist | AI use Yellow | Comparison of an existing policy with section 61 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992, if the policy is put forward as an action plan, and with the positive duty as the Fair Work Ombudsman page states it. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.