Build a discrimination chronology and comparator table from the file
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From permitted emails, rosters and policies, draft a dated chronology and a comparator table (treatment of the complainant vs named comparators) with document cites.
- What the lawyer must review
- Decide who is a true comparator; it is a legal issue
- Do not invent comparators
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From permitted emails, rosters and policies, draft a dated chronology and a comparator table (treatment of the complainant vs named comparators) with document cites. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.
Sources
Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.