Decide whether US client material can go into a tool
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Classify each document as public, confidential under Rule 1.6, PHI, tax-return information, or California consumer personal information.
- What the lawyer must review
- Default to no for anything relating to the representation
- Allow input only if vendor terms, Rule 1.6 and any sector statute are satisfied
- Apply Opinion 512 and the Florida, California, Texas and D.C. opinions
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes extracting and organising information. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.