Jurisdiction

Saskatchewan

2 AI instruments checked on 10 October 2026.

Saskatchewan lists 2 AI instruments checked on 10 October 2026, grouped by courts, regulators, law societies, privacy regulators and legislation.

Choose a practice area AI practice notes by Australian court AI rules tracker by Australian court and body

One email a month when a court changes its AI practice note or a tool is added to the catalogue. Your address is kept for that note. See Privacy.

Canada Alberta British Columbia Manitoba Newfoundland and Labrador Nova Scotia Ontario Quebec Yukon

AI instruments

Courts Law societies and bars AI practice notes by Australian court Practice areas

Courts

Courts for Saskatchewan
Instrument	Issuer	Date on page	What it says	Source
General Application Practice Directive #12 – Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court SubmissionsPractice directiveCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.	Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan	2026-01-01 (effective) · Effective 2026-01-01	Court of King’s Bench directive, effective 1 January 2026. It does not prohibit appropriate use of AI. The person who files or presents material must ensure it is accurate, and must independently verify authorities generated, summarised or cited with AI. Reliance on AI does not reduce the duty to ensure accuracy of written and oral submissions Unverified or fabricated authorities may attract costs or other sanctions	Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan

Law societies and bars

Law societies and bars for Saskatchewan
Instrument	Issuer	Date on page	What it says	Source
Guidelines for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of LawGuidanceLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.	Law Society of Saskatchewan	Not stated	Guidelines adapted from the California State Bar guidance on generative AI, mapped to Saskatchewan professional duties. Recommends workplace AI policies and continuous learning	Law Society of Saskatchewan

Every stored instrument

This is the catalogue for Saskatchewan. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.

AI instruments for Saskatchewan
Instrument	Issuer	Date on page	What it says	Source
General Application Practice Directive #12 – Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court SubmissionsPractice directiveCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: highProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.	Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan	2026-01-01 (effective) · Effective 2026-01-01	Court of King’s Bench directive, effective 1 January 2026. It does not prohibit appropriate use of AI. The person who files or presents material must ensure it is accurate, and must independently verify authorities generated, summarised or cited with AI. Reliance on AI does not reduce the duty to ensure accuracy of written and oral submissions Unverified or fabricated authorities may attract costs or other sanctions	Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan
Guidelines for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of LawGuidanceLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Scope not stated in the stored source.	Law Society of Saskatchewan	Not stated	Guidelines adapted from the California State Bar guidance on generative AI, mapped to Saskatchewan professional duties. Recommends workplace AI policies and continuous learning	Law Society of Saskatchewan

Before the work starts

Guidance
Topic	Guidance
How this page is organised	Instruments are grouped into courts, regulators, law societies and bars, privacy regulators, legislation, government and international bodies.
Jurisdiction	Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

Checks to carry into the matter

Open the instrument that applies to this forum before you rely on it.
A row marked Secondary source is a lead. Retrieve the issuer’s own page.
A date marked unverified is the text printed on the page, not a confirmed commencement.

Limits on AI assistance

Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.