Jurisdiction
Ontario
1 AI instrument checked on 10 October 2026.
Ontario lists 1 AI instrument checked on 10 October 2026, grouped by courts, regulators, law societies, privacy regulators and legislation.
Choose a practice area AI practice notes by Australian court AI rules tracker by Australian court and body
Court AI rule changes + new tools, monthly
One email a month when a court changes its AI practice note or a tool is added to the catalogue. Your address is kept for that note. See Privacy.
Related jurisdictions
AI instruments
LegislationNo guidance found as of 10 Oct 2026AI practice notes by Australian court Practice areas
Legislation
| Instrument | Issuer | Date on page | What it says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 4.06.1(2.1) – factum certification of authorities and quotations | Ontario (Rules of Civil Procedure) | 2026-09-01 (in force) · Effective 2026-09-01 | From 1 September 2026, a factum must include a signed statement that the signer is satisfied every authority cited is authentic and every quotation accurately reproduces the authority. O. Reg. 275/26 replaced the authenticity-only text introduced by O. Reg. 384/24. The subrule does not require a statement that AI was or was not used.
| Ontario (Rules of Civil Procedure) |
No guidance found as of 10 Oct 2026
- Law Society of Ontario · Law society · checked 2026-10-10LSO technology page could not be fetched on 10 Oct 2026; existing batch 2 row (white paper, secondary) retained.
Every stored instrument
This is the catalogue for Ontario. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.
| Instrument | Issuer | Date on page | What it says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 4.06.1(2.1) – factum certification of authorities and quotations | Ontario (Rules of Civil Procedure) | 2026-09-01 (in force) · Effective 2026-09-01 | From 1 September 2026, a factum must include a signed statement that the signer is satisfied every authority cited is authentic and every quotation accurately reproduces the authority. O. Reg. 275/26 replaced the authenticity-only text introduced by O. Reg. 384/24. The subrule does not require a statement that AI was or was not used.
| Ontario (Rules of Civil Procedure) |
Before the work starts
| Topic | Guidance |
|---|---|
| How this page is organised | Instruments are grouped into courts, regulators, law societies and bars, privacy regulators, legislation, government and international bodies. |
| Jurisdiction | No guidance found as of 10 Oct 2026 for Law Society of Ontario. |
Checks to carry into the matter
- Open the instrument that applies to this forum before you rely on it.
- A row marked Secondary source is a lead. Retrieve the issuer’s own page.
- A date marked unverified is the text printed on the page, not a confirmed commencement.
Limits on AI assistance
- Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.