Jurisdiction

Alberta

2 AI instruments checked on 10 October 2026.

Alberta lists 2 AI instruments checked on 10 October 2026, grouped by courts, regulators, law societies, privacy regulators and legislation.

Choose a practice area AI practice notes by Australian court AI rules tracker by Australian court and body

One email a month when a court changes its AI practice note or a tool is added to the catalogue. Your address is kept for that note. See Privacy.

Canada British Columbia Manitoba Newfoundland and Labrador Nova Scotia Ontario Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon

AI instruments

Courts Law societies and bars AI practice notes by Australian court Practice areas

Courts

Courts for Alberta
Instrument	Issuer	Date on page	What it says	Source
Notice to the Profession & Public – Ensuring the integrity of court submissions when using large language modelsPractice noticeCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumUnverified dateDate not shown on announcement page; tri-court PDF at albertacourts.ca/docs/default-source/qb/npp/tri-court-notice-to-profession-and-public---large-language-models.pdfSecondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.	Alberta Courts (Court of Appeal, King's Bench, Court of Justice)	Not stated	Tri-court notice urging caution with LLM-derived authorities and requiring meaningful human verification of AI-generated submissions. "Human in the loop" verification against reliable legal databases	Alberta Courts (Court of Appeal, King's Bench, Court of Justice)

Law societies and bars

Law societies and bars for Alberta
Instrument	Issuer	Date on page	What it says	Source
The Generative AI PlaybookGuidanceLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.	Law Society of Alberta	2023-12-20	Playbook on how Alberta lawyers can use generative AI safely, tied to the technological competence duty in Code rule 3.1-2. Technological competence commentary [5] to rule 3.1-2	Law Society of Alberta

Every stored instrument

This is the catalogue for Alberta. An instrument appears under “Rules that apply” only when you name the court or tribunal, or say that no court is involved.

AI instruments for Alberta
Instrument	Issuer	Date on page	What it says	Source
Notice to the Profession & Public – Ensuring the integrity of court submissions when using large language modelsPractice noticeCourtPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumUnverified dateDate not shown on announcement page; tri-court PDF at albertacourts.ca/docs/default-source/qb/npp/tri-court-notice-to-profession-and-public---large-language-models.pdfSecondary. Scope not stated in the stored source.	Alberta Courts (Court of Appeal, King's Bench, Court of Justice)	Not stated	Tri-court notice urging caution with LLM-derived authorities and requiring meaningful human verification of AI-generated submissions. "Human in the loop" verification against reliable legal databases	Alberta Courts (Court of Appeal, King's Bench, Court of Justice)
The Generative AI PlaybookGuidanceLaw societyPrimary sourceConfidence: mediumProfessional guidance. Guides lawyers. Not a court practice note.	Law Society of Alberta	2023-12-20	Playbook on how Alberta lawyers can use generative AI safely, tied to the technological competence duty in Code rule 3.1-2. Technological competence commentary [5] to rule 3.1-2	Law Society of Alberta

Before the work starts

Guidance
Topic	Guidance
How this page is organised	Instruments are grouped into courts, regulators, law societies and bars, privacy regulators, legislation, government and international bodies.
Jurisdiction	Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

Checks to carry into the matter

Open the instrument that applies to this forum before you rely on it.
A row marked Secondary source is a lead. Retrieve the issuer’s own page.
A date marked unverified is the text printed on the page, not a confirmed commencement.

Limits on AI assistance

Confirm firm, client and applicable court or professional restrictions before using any AI feature.